Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Crunchy Frog

(28,128 posts)
8. Exactly. I get tired of the use of the term king, when it's clearly a dictatorship that he's striving for.
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 06:11 AM
Wednesday

Charles III has essentially no political power. Nor does he have that much freedom in his personal life, and I doubt that he would be able to demolish historical buildings at will, even if he formally owns them. He's very much constrained by tradition and expectations.

I don't think George III had that much power either. When he got too crazy he was essentially 25thd, with his son taking over as regent.

I guess maybe it plays well in publicity, but it's not accurate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'He lied': Fury grows ove...»Reply #8