Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,271 posts)
18. It helps to understand Supreme Court procedures
Sat May 24, 2025, 05:58 PM
May 24

The initial request for a stay pending appeal filed by DOGE was directed to Roberts as the Justice responsible for handling such requests arising out of the US District Court for the District of Columbia. If Roberts had denied it, DOGE could have renewed its request in front of any Justice it chose -- including Thomas or Alito. And they might have issued a more sweeping stay than the one issued by Roberts. So as is often the case, the stay issued by Roberts may be a defensive maneuver to keep control of the matter rather than leave it the hands of a Justice chosen by DOGE.



https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3465168

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice Roberts tem...»Reply #18