Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Trump administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelan migrants [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(166,448 posts)6. Supreme Court rules Trump administration must give Venezuelans more time to challenge deportation under Alien Enemies Ac
This also makes me smile. 24 hours is not sufficient time to object
Venezuelan men held in Texas had urged the court to prevent the government from sending them to a prison in El Salvador before they could challenge the move in court.
BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump administration must give Venezuelans more time to challenge deportation under Alien Enemies Act
— MSNBC (@msnbc.com) 2025-05-16T20:15:44.657Z
www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...
Link to tweet
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-trump-administration-venezuelans-alien-enemies-act-rcna202094
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court on Friday dealt a blow against the Trump administration's attempt to send Venezuelans it says are gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the detainees must have a proper chance to raise legal objections.
The 7-2 decision, which grants a request made by a group of Venezuelans, clarified an unusual order issued by the justices in the early hours of April 19 that hit pause on any government plans to deport people held in northern Texas.
The justices in the latest unsigned decision faulted the administration for only giving the detainees 24 hours to launch legal challenges.
"Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster," the ruling said......
The Trump administration's attempt to summarily deport immigrants without giving them a chance to contest whether they are gang members or whether the law can even be applied to criminal organizations is part of its hardline immigration policy that has faced considerable pushback from courts as well as political opponents.
Although the Alien Enemies Act can only be used at a time of "invasions or predatory incursions," the government has argued that those conditions are met because the gang is effectively an arm of the Venezuelan government, a claim that is heavily contested.
The court's April order, coming just hours after a bus carrying Venezuelans left a detention center in Texas toward an airport but then turned around, put the entire case on hold while the justices figured out what next steps to take.
The Supreme Court had, in an April 7 decision, made it clear that any people the government wants to deport under the Alien Enemies Act need to be given the chance to challenge the decision via habeas corpus petitions.
The 7-2 decision, which grants a request made by a group of Venezuelans, clarified an unusual order issued by the justices in the early hours of April 19 that hit pause on any government plans to deport people held in northern Texas.
The justices in the latest unsigned decision faulted the administration for only giving the detainees 24 hours to launch legal challenges.
"Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster," the ruling said......
The Trump administration's attempt to summarily deport immigrants without giving them a chance to contest whether they are gang members or whether the law can even be applied to criminal organizations is part of its hardline immigration policy that has faced considerable pushback from courts as well as political opponents.
Although the Alien Enemies Act can only be used at a time of "invasions or predatory incursions," the government has argued that those conditions are met because the gang is effectively an arm of the Venezuelan government, a claim that is heavily contested.
The court's April order, coming just hours after a bus carrying Venezuelans left a detention center in Texas toward an airport but then turned around, put the entire case on hold while the justices figured out what next steps to take.
The Supreme Court had, in an April 7 decision, made it clear that any people the government wants to deport under the Alien Enemies Act need to be given the chance to challenge the decision via habeas corpus petitions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Trump administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelan migrants [View all]
In It to Win It
May 16
OP
Bring them back now and allow due process if they can prove their offenses are unlawful.
Deuxcents
May 16
#4
Supreme Court rules Trump administration must give Venezuelans more time to challenge deportation under Alien Enemies Ac
LetMyPeopleVote
May 16
#6
OK maybe I'll start hoping again. I was expecting them to sell us all up the river. And democracy.
lindysalsagal
May 16
#7
and SCOTUS will get pissed and continue to vote against him in every case
LymphocyteLover
May 16
#21
it's happening.... big question is whether they actually attack SCOTUS more directly
LymphocyteLover
May 18
#50
So, with THIS ruling, if i read it right. That not just one person (Garcia) but ALL
bluestarone
May 16
#22
This case is about the Venezuelan detainees being held in the Northern District of Texas, not Garcia. nt
sl8
May 16
#25
"The issue isn't how SCOTUS rules. It's if these rulings will be complied with."
J_William_Ryan
May 16
#28