If one is another, why isn't the other the same one?

[aspirant]

12. I responded to exactly what you wrote.

Does the word "retroactive" exist in your vocabulary.

ALL forms of bankruptcy "change the terms to the lender's detriment." This was a joke, right? Any lender lending on credit knows he is taking a risk. The USA loans to 18 year-olds with no assets because they want to invest in our countries future.If good jobs don't exist to repay these loans, you say go along with the existing system(in the box) and screw our youth. The FED loans trillions to the filthy bankers and when they default, we just loan them trillions more, but the unlucky poor students must live in efficiency apts for years. Don't see a problem here, right?

"Easter Bunny Banking and Trust" Ohhh, that would be the US govt giving filthy banksters money on only a SMALL % OF RESERVE ASSETS to pay back the loan. How about AIG taking billions in bets that they couldn't pay back, are they the Easter Bunny too?Did you forget all these trumped-up mortgages that would never be paid back? EASTER BUNNY MORTGAGE AND LOAN

"What's the advantage" so they wouldn't be stuck for many years in the legal system as individual filings by the mega-millions.

Was KELO controversial? Can Joe Smith, a natural person, get the govt to file eminent domain to get ABC corporation's land ?

"Campaign spending would indeed take many years" and now you change from cheering for Vote to Amend and giving them millions to hoping for a SCOTUS change. Nothing else, no fighting back like the repubs have done with Roe vs Wade, just fingers crossed again.

Present-day "specific legal analysis" is still thinking in the box. According to this logic, Hobby Lobby had no business filing their suit because it disrupted the legal status quo of society. Your legal analysis is yours not mine!