Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
19. OWS, especially OWS Boston, which is credited with having given new life to Orwell's "99%",
Fri Jan 2, 2015, 06:55 AM
Jan 2015

had an incalculable impact.

Before OWS: "So, specifically how will we be cutting entitlements and by exactly how much (to start)?"

The January 2009 promise by Obama to cut entitlements;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011504114.html

The 2010 naming by Obama of the Cat Food Commission, aka the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, headed by the notorious Simpson (R) and manned, in part, by Paul Ryan, bringing him to national prominence (watch out for the word "reform&quot , even before final passage of the ACA;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_on_Fiscal_Responsibility_and_Reform

The whispered offer in May 2011 from a hot miked Clinton (Bubba) to Ryan to help persuade Democrats to "reform" Medicare;

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/05/bill-clinton-to-paul-ryan-on-medicare-election-give-me-a-call/

Conyers calling out Obama in July 2011 for putting Social Security and Medicare on the table, even though Boehner and Cantor had not asked Obama for them.

http://www.crewof42.com/news/conyers-on-jobs-weve-had-it-lays-out-obama-calls-for-protest-at-white-house/

Sperling, a member of the Obama White House comes up with the idea of a budget sequester, though he denies having done so (after being caught he gives as his reason for the denial that the Republicans modified his idea, rather than accepting it exactly as he suggested it. (No, really, that was his excuse.) Gee, who could ever possibly foresee that Republicans would not accept a budget measure from the Obama White House exactly as it was, with no modification whatever?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_sequestration_in_2013

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html


Naming by Obama in August 2011 of the possibly (probably?) unconstitutional Super Committee, aka "the Grand Bargain Committee," aka the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/11/news/economy/debt_committee_members/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011


BUT THEN,

People like Hedges plan and begin publicizing an "occupation" of Washington D.C., to begin on October 6, 2011, which has its own website, but Occupy Wall Street starts sooner, in September 2011; and Hedges, Seeger and many others appear in NYC instead.

Politicians, including Obama, go full into 2016 re-election mode and they don't campaign on cutting entitlements. However, the WH comes up with the concept of a sequester, which gets triggered in 2013--after the 2012 re-election of Obama.

Changing a national conversation so quickly after all the events and momentum only hinted at in this post on almost zero dollars is a phenom the guys and gals in ad agencies would love to know how to duplicate.

OWS does not get a fraction of the credit it deserves and I wholly distrust every Dem who pooh poohs it, or worse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Populism has gone mainstream" [View all] RiverLover Dec 2014 OP
No! We must continue to move right to capture the vote of that mythical moderate Republican! Scuba Dec 2014 #1
And we keep on getting shown polls that are really just name recognition. Boy, I fear the Third Way djean111 Dec 2014 #2
Exactly djean111! nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #3
There's zero talk of policy from the left side of the aisle. The Progressive Caucus Budget .... Scuba Dec 2014 #4
That's good Scuba. You should enter that at PCCC's ThinkBig.us RiverLover Dec 2014 #5
Defence / Offence cuts are the hard part. We have to show we don't need to be the world police. L0oniX Dec 2014 #6
And that trillion dollar airplanes that don't work =/= national security. Scuba Dec 2014 #7
Even if stuff doesn't work, military contractors get rich, which is the point. merrily Dec 2014 #13
Yeah, but they can't say that so our point will win with the voters. Scuba Dec 2014 #14
Are we the world's police, or the world's thugs? At various times, we are one or the other or both. merrily Jan 2015 #21
I agree. jwirr Dec 2014 #8
The dems wouldn't need corporate money if they ran on that platform. -nt CrispyQ Dec 2014 #10
At this point, would a majority believe them if they ran on that platform? merrily Dec 2014 #15
That is a problem. As a party, they have no credibility. -nt CrispyQ Dec 2014 #16
Third Way is about Benjamins, not voters. merrily Dec 2014 #12
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #9
Kick. JEB Dec 2014 #11
People have more information about Wall St now than they did even a few years ago. sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #17
OWS, especially OWS Boston, which is credited with having given new life to Orwell's "99%", merrily Jan 2015 #19
More and more, the things some DUers have been posting since well before I registered merrily Jan 2015 #18
Point of Order: In 1994, most voters were oblivious to the fact that the Party was splitting merrily Jan 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»"Populism has gone m...»Reply #19