Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)

27. How is this any different in practical application than now?

Reply to EEO (Original post)

Sat Nov 29, 2014, 02:48 PM

Nov 2014

As long as the party knows in the end it will have your vote then everything else said or done is preamble and justification for the final preordained event.

No Turd Way by definition requires all options be on the table and seriously so unless you are running a constant "leave the line blank" or write in campaigns.

You cannot serve two masters with conflicting aims. What is the priority?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No third party, no third way. [View all] EEO Nov 2014 OP

You are advocating that Dems copy the Tea Party, but without Koch money and organization, merrily Nov 2014 #1

We already have these things in California. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #6

PLUS ONE, a whole bunch! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #19

People are working on voter registration. But what choices are they being given regarding who to sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #9

+10000000000 ReRe Nov 2014 #12

I'm with you, sabrina 1! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #20

I'm with you, sabrina 1! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #21

Providing candidates that are not corporate backed. Good idea. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #22

Talking to MSM Democrats who are friends, family, and acquaintances Zorra Nov 2014 #2

Many Democrats to this day do not realize how the party has changed merrily Nov 2014 #4

Yes! That's because it's been done to them gradually RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #5

It changed when the GOP'ers tagged Dems as Libs... Historic NY Nov 2014 #10

^^This!^^ BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #13

PS. I forgot to say that naming it after any President could be a mistake. merrily Nov 2014 #3

There are three major Roosevelts in history. The group is not named only for FDR. EEO Nov 2014 #7

I think FDR would be the one who leapt to most minds, no matter what. merrily Nov 2014 #24

I don't think the name should include the word "Party" as the connotation is that it's a third rhett o rick Nov 2014 #16

Too many Dems in "red states" are brainwashed into believing they have to ask permission. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #8

One thing for sure. No third way, no third party................. wandy Nov 2014 #11

I think you've got something there.... ReRe Nov 2014 #15

I think the electorate is nearing a tipping point paulkienitz Nov 2014 #14

I think getting coverage in the Corp-Media is a must. nm rhett o rick Nov 2014 #17

At this point, an overhaul of the Democratic Party Eleanors38 Nov 2014 #18

Kicked & Rec'd /nt demwing Nov 2014 #23

Third party arguement jeepers Nov 2014 #25

Shrug. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #26

How is this any different in practical application than now? TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #27