Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
3. Sleight of hand going on in the headline.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 03:32 AM
Nov 2014

Last edited Tue Nov 11, 2014, 01:45 AM - Edit history (1)

Krauss didn't say it WILL be gone in a generation. He said it CAN be, if we take certain steps.

But I agree with him, if we put our minds to it, and teach children how to approach the question of faith on their own, rather than telling them what to think.

Problem is, we aren't. For every family I know, raising a child like mine, there's at LEAST one family I know actively indoctrinating sub-5 year olds into a particular faith.

And suspiciously, I note none of these children are of a different faith than their parents. I know an enormous number of Christian families. All their kids speak of Jesus. Not a single one speaks of Allah and his Prophet Muhammad, or the Dali Lama/Enlightenment, or any other number of enormously popular current religions.

Not one.

Fascinating.

No, religion won't be gone in a generation, because the precondition Krauss suggests, isn't happening. And that's why Krauss DIDN'T say 'will be gone'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Atheist scientist claims ...»Reply #3