Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mental Health Information

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

3. I would suggest you change the link to the article you reference.

Reply to ellenrr (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 29, 2014, 05:28 AM

Aug 2014

I will be glad to take a look at it, but I'm not going to search for it.

I would particularly like to look at the data he is using, as I find the initial premise pretty unsupportable.

If your hostility is based on facts and data, I would be interested in discussing it with you as well.

I have serious criticisms of psychiatry, but am, in general, very supportive of it as a medical field and of the people that are cared for within it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Treatment-resistant depression [View all] ellenrr Aug 2014 OP

Wow, your link goes to another article, but it sure does tell you where this author cbayer Aug 2014 #1

It's a point of view. No need to dismiss it, until you read the article. He is ellenrr Aug 2014 #2

I would suggest you change the link to the article you reference. cbayer Aug 2014 #3

Whoops, forgive me. I see now that you excepted this form the linked article cbayer Aug 2014 #4

I also think that when an insider criticizes psychiatry, ellenrr Aug 2014 #6

Ok, I read the part of the article you reference in your OP. cbayer Aug 2014 #5

IMO some basic misunderstanding of theoretical effort is in play HereSince1628 Aug 2014 #7

Than you for this. cbayer Aug 2014 #8

Yes, the hypothetical paper is being taken as something it is not HereSince1628 Aug 2014 #9