There is no evidence for the existence of God.

[Lordquinton]

154. Speaking of lieing, I never said you did

Now for the quote you cherry picked:

n this physical Universe, it’s important to observe all that we can, and to measure every bit of knowledge we can glean. Only from the full suite of data available can we hope to ever draw valid, scientific conclusions about the nature of our Universe. Some of those conclusions will have implications that we may not be able to measure: the existence of the multiverse arises from that. But when people then contend that they can draw conclusions about fundamental constants, the laws of physics, or the values of string vacua, they’re no longer doing science; they’re speculating. Wishful thinking is no substitute for data, experiments, or observables. Until we have those, be aware that the multiverse is a consequence of the best science we have available today, but it doesn’t make any scientific predictions we can put to the test.

So you know I can still post 3 more paragraphs from this article and be within the TOS.

It says that the multiverse theory is a result of not being able to observe everything, but it's not supported because we can't yet observe it. It goes on to say that people who then claim that because of the multiverse theory there could be universes where physics are different are completely unbased and with absolutely zero support (this is where the author Ethan Siegel is speaking directly to you).

To your analogy, there is nothing to suggest that the rooms outside our own should be any different fundamentally than our own, the evidence that we have only gives a shadow of a suggestion that other rooms might exist.

There's evidence to support my thought that you didn't actually read the article.

Stop calling me a liar now.