Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustAnotherGen

(35,201 posts)
4. And don't forget
Wed May 9, 2012, 03:12 PM
May 2012

Slavery by any other name - which in an of itself forced everything from the 'angry independent black woman' to the idea concept that black men by birth and nature 'take to crime':

The African American (AA) community is not monolithic. But there are a few factors at play here. One is that parts of the AA community have struggled economically because of young AA men, getting young AA women pregnant, and then moving on
.

We have the perception that young black men do not step up to the plate, the reality that many cannot as America is NOT equal in terms of opportunity at birth - and then the 'psyche' of black America - the ripping apart of families, fathers sold down the river, mothers raped, etc. etc. etc.

To the OP - I think the key thing JoePhilly pointed out is that the 'black community' doesn't need to be thrown under the bus by and large.

For me - I'm part of the No Wedding No Womb movement . . . now ask me how I feel about marriage in general - I think if a gay couple wants to have a child together (be via surrogacy, adoption, etc. etc.) then they most certainly SHOULD get married in order to protect their children legally and financially. A different take on the situation - but you'll see where the woma who started this concept amongst black women (google her website) would most likely agree. Marriage for gays if for no other reason than to protect their CHILDREN financially/legally and to ensure they grow up in a two parent home.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why isn't it the same? [View all] SoutherDem May 2012 OP
I don't know about Religious reasons JustAnotherGen May 2012 #1
Here in the south it was religious SoutherDem May 2012 #5
I think its more complicated than that. JoePhilly May 2012 #2
And don't forget JustAnotherGen May 2012 #4
Agree completely ... JoePhilly May 2012 #7
Wasn't meaning to through the whole group under the bus SoutherDem May 2012 #10
Have never thought of that. SoutherDem May 2012 #6
Cool ... I'm in the agnostic leaning atheist group as well. JoePhilly May 2012 #9
Loving v. Virginia is similar... onpatrol98 May 2012 #3
Pointless??? SoutherDem May 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»LGBT Civil Rights and Activism»Why isn't it the same?»Reply #4