Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(35,886 posts)
5. I am most of the way through the print version and commented on it in another thread here.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:35 PM
Apr 22
"The key conclusion Orwell took away from his time in...

I wrote that post early on in the reading, which I was doing in the waiting room while my wife was having a heart procedure.

It's really a most interesting read, and an interesting juxtaposition of these two historical figures, creative in that aspect alone. They had very different attitudes about Empire, having both been involved in the Empire in very different capacities.

I am now reading (simultaneously depending on my mood) Nigel Hamilton's trilogy on FDR's management of the war, and how, rightly, he and Churchill were at odds in 1943 because Roosevelt, rightly, wanted to involvement in maintaining or restoring the British Empire. Churchill didn't like that one bit, of course, but Roosevelt didn't care. By 1945, the US and the Soviet Union were the world powers and Britain had declined to a secondary power with the Empire reaching a deserved collapse.

Thanks for your comment. I've never done Kindle. I'm an old man and paper is my preference for history readings, PDF's for technical scientific stuff.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»World History»Based on the interesting ...»Reply #5