Antiscience and ethical concerns associated with advocacy of Lyme disease.

[KMDickson]

3. Auwaerter, Yale and IDSA on "Lyme Disease"

You are correct to recognize this "AntiScience" assault on science as offense being the best defense for IDSA's crimes. It is IDSA who have performed the fraudulent science starting with the the current CDC diagnostic standard ("Dearborn&quot .

All of IDSA's other -isms are based on this Dearborn lie. But of course, these unscientific fraudsters can't tell us what was the structure/function of OspA was. Go ahead and call anyone at Yale, IDSA, Auwaerter, the NIH, NIAID, or the CDC and ask for the structure of the molecule they called a vaccine, OspA. They will tell you they do not know.

And that is because what OspA is, is the disease. It is the immunosuppression outcomes formerly known and reported by IDSA as the New Great Imitator (MS, Lupus, Cancer, ALS, strokes). IDSA is scared to death not only what what happens to baby-killers in prison, but their reputations. Notice that they get no more funding.

For how many years can you make a claim that such and such a disease is not a disease and expect to get a grant to study it?

Don't be frightened by IDSA's hysterical response to the world recognizing their intellectual incompetence. That's all this is. They're pariahs.


http://www.actionlyme.org