Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lambchopp59

(2,809 posts)
2. Scientific and "woke" settings, concur.
Mon Dec 12, 2022, 10:41 AM
Dec 2022

A large portion of, especially un-woke MAGA men fall straight into the pejorative column of this. I've witnessed countless of the ilk utilize the full pejorative inflections of "queer" or "fag" in a complaint about even the most fleeting, innocent or nuanced suggestion of same sex anything "They gotta push it in my face", two breaths later expressing locker room "woot-woot" at blatant heterosuggestive references, nudity, female sexual organ displays. I've called the ilk "heterosupremecist".
The article from a teenage targeted publication seems like preaching to the mostly "woke" choir.
Of the heteroassumptive, it's likely the "too stupid to recognize their stupidity" can apply. Doubly so for those who insist the reproductive prerogative is paramount, even on an overpopulated planet, and suffix "default" may fly right over their heads as well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Heteronormative Meaning: ...»Reply #2