Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Molten Metal at World Trade Center.11th September 2001. [View all]nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)41. Citibank Tower NYC - 1978
The Secret Retrofit
Uploaded on Jan 17, 2008
A useful counterpoint to the 9/11 Truth denier's oft-repeated claim that the World Trade Center's owners could not have installed explosives without being detected.
The video from Discovery's "Science Channel" summarizes the story of the Citicorp Center, which underwent major structural retrofits barely a year after its completion, when the architect, William LeMessurier, realized that a design flaw could lead to the building's collapse in a strong wind.
The truth only became known to the public nearly twenty years later, in a 1995 article that appeared in New Yorker magazine entitled "The Fifty-Nine-Story Crisis"...
"The weakest joint, he discovered, was at the building's thirtieth floor; if that one gave way, catastrophic failure of the whole structure would follow. Next, he took New York City weather records provided by Alan Davenport and calculated the probability of a storm severe enough to tear that joint apart. His figures told him that such an event had a statistical probability of occurring as often as once every sixteen years--what meteorologists call a sixteen-year storm.
"That was very low, awesomely low," LeMessurier said, his voice hushed as if the horror of discovery were still fresh.
On Tuesday morning, August 8th, the public-affairs department of Citibank, Citicorp's chief subsidiary, put out the long delayed press release. In language as bland as a loan officer's wardrobe, the three-paragraph document said unnamed "engineers who designed the building" had recommended that "certain of the connections in Citicorp Center's wind bracing system be strengthened through additional welding.'' The engineers, the press release added, "have assured us that there is no danger."
WELDERS started work almost immediately, their torches a dazzlement in the night sky."
Ask yourself, how many people know this story - even today - ten years after a magazine article was published about it?
It is obvious that the installation of cutter charges in the WTC Towers could easily have been accomplished with no public awareness of what was being planned - especially in view of eyewitness accounts of mysterious power outages and construction noise in the towers in the days and weeks before 9/11.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citigroup_Center#Engineering_crisis_of_1978
Because nothing happened as a result of the engineering gaffe, the danger was kept hidden from the public for almost 20 years. It was publicized in a lengthy article in The New Yorker in 1995
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Al melts but doesn't glow bright orange when heated less than 1800 degrees F!
wildbilln864
Oct 2014
#2
Your links undercut your argument of large amounts of unburnt thermate in the rubble pile
hack89
Nov 2014
#20
They covered the vertical columns with tons of thermate and miles of det cord completely undetected?
hack89
Nov 2014
#33
So you of course can show where large building demolitions are routinely done with wireless?
hack89
Nov 2014
#37
"WELDERS started work almost immediately, their torches a dazzlement in the night sky."
hack89
Nov 2014
#44
So how long did it take to smuggle in and install tons of thermate and wire it up?
hack89
Nov 2014
#45
No melted steel on 911, 911 truth fails, and falls short of Creative Speculation standards
superbeachnut
Nov 2014
#12
1000 C means no melted steel. You proved no melted steel on 911 - you are a debunker
superbeachnut
Nov 2014
#60