Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Small Business Owners & Entrepreneurs

Sivafae

(480 posts)

2. Not really

Reply to Fridays Child (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 30, 2012, 04:36 AM

Nov 2012

The amount that most everyone 'round here is taxed at 15% roughly for a single. The child deduction would make it less so. So that would be an extra 20 or more per cent reduction in pay. This is the bay area too so, there isn't much breathing room.

Thanks for responding.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Worker's Comp issue. My worker is still coming to work although she is not suppose to. [View all] Sivafae Nov 2012 OP

But that 65% is not taxed or reduced by other deductions, right? Fridays Child Nov 2012 #1

Not really Sivafae Nov 2012 #2

Did the WC doc clear her to return to work? Fridays Child Nov 2012 #3

I bet, when the Republicans flying by read that you are paying a worker who has also jtuck004 Nov 2012 #4

The claim for the worker's comp hasn't been approved yet. Sivafae Nov 2012 #5