Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
8. HorsePiss is not a choice I would recommend.
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 11:24 AM
Mar 2013

I had so much trouble, that I eventually bought a machine for more robust than I needed. Xerox Phaser served me well for 8 years before it coughed, apologized, and left this flat earth for Printer Heaven.

I have been using (heavily) a Brother MFP 9320 which has more than exceeded my expectations. The envelop handling, the stacked scanning (before I got a dedicated one) and the quality B&W printing was very satisfactory. Color? Not so much. The image was there, but the quality was fair, at best. Good enough for court exhibits, NOT good enough to make artwork.

Something about HP's printers - I have felt (and often read) that HP doesn't play well with Macs. From my experience, I would never return. HP does not put in a lot of R&D for Mac. That whole company is only concerned with Window dressing.

Having played with other models, any of the Xerox line is worth a look. Good quality, workhorse power, and the toners won't kill you. Brothers are also recommended. The best part is that Brother cares about its mac users, and their products interface solidly with Macs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Apple Users»Okay, I'm about to make a...»Reply #8