Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)
5. Don't forget this qualifier though.
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:39 AM
Sep 2015

I'm not saying you're not right and the workers were not trained well, but since about 2002, when the results of elections began to register a significant red shift in every election, the polling companies have begun "adjusting" their results on the basis of new ideas about likely over-sampling of Democrats though there is no evidence that this over-sampling is actually happening. The only reason these "adjustments" are done for polls is because the exit polling is so consistently showing more Dem votes than are reported in the "actual" (machine counted) results. The polling companies are private companies remember and if they get a reputation for reporting results that do not match the "actual" (i.e., the machine counted) results, that company will not be trusted or stay in business long. This probably explains why the GA election in 2002 very quickly reported problems with the exit polling and the exit polls were discontinued for that election.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»FAQ about Exit Polling An...»Reply #5