Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

North Carolina

OldBaldy1701E

(7,576 posts)

1. I cannot wait to throw that one back at the rethugs...

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 31, 2025, 09:22 AM

Jan 31

The federal court’s order cited “due regard for state sovereignty and the independence of states to decide matters of substantial public concern” as the reason for the court to abstain from deciding Griffin's case.

The second they start using their federal power to change what they don't like in the states, we need to start saying this. Over and over.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments on Jefferson Griffin's election protests [View all] RandySF Jan 30 OP

I cannot wait to throw that one back at the rethugs... OldBaldy1701E Jan 31 #1