Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(7,799 posts)
23. That's just silly. A nominee being confirmed with 50 votes vs a nominee being confirmed
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 09:36 AM
Wednesday

with 70 votes vs a nominee being confirmed with 90 votes is irrelevant. They are all confirmed and have the exact same amount of power no matter how many votes they got. Rubio was confirmed by unanimous consent. Would he be any better if all Democrats had voted against him? Of course not. He's terrible regardless. Democratic votes did not help the Republicans at all. He was going to be confirmed regardless.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

🤬🤬🤬🤬 Chasstev365 Tuesday #1
lol RandiFan1290 Tuesday #2
I'm curious about that list. ificandream Tuesday #3
Sheldon Whitehouse?! intheflow Tuesday #4
There are several anti trump conservative judges out there mountain grammy Tuesday #10
So far this year, 12 Judicial nominees have been confirmed Wiz Imp Wednesday #36
Might be part of a deal to get the heathcare tax credits covered OP. cstanleytech Tuesday #5
Seems like when dealing with these people we should get our perks Hope22 Tuesday #6
once the judge is sworn in it is for life rampartd Tuesday #8
You can't trust the word of a repuglican mdbl Wednesday #31
Yes you can trust them......to break it if they just feel like it. cstanleytech Wednesday #38
Nope. Democratic votes made no difference in the confirmation. Wiz Imp Wednesday #37
"I have to wonder why Democrats are doing anything to help republicans" Wiz Imp Tuesday #7
I get at least one or two texts a day asking doc03 Tuesday #9
I beg to differ Mysterian Wednesday #17
That's just silly. A nominee being confirmed with 50 votes vs a nominee being confirmed Wiz Imp Wednesday #23
Precisely why I question the Democratic votes Mysterian Wednesday #24
There have been 12 Judicial nominees confirmed so far this year. Wiz Imp Wednesday #35
I agree 100% Ferrets are Cool Wednesday #27
Repubs did need help for cloture, which the dems provided questionseverything Wednesday #18
WRONG. There is no filibuster on nominees. Wiz Imp Wednesday #22
See post # 14 questionseverything Wednesday #29
So what? I repeat: THERE IS NO FILIBUSTER ALLOWED ON NOMINEES. Wiz Imp Wednesday #32
This isn't my job, I don't care either way questionseverything Wednesday #33
{sigh} 🙄🧱🙄🧱 Wiz Imp Wednesday #34
Some "opposition party," eh? (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus Wednesday #11
WTAF. 58Sunliner Wednesday #12
Thank Goddess my two are not on that list. With the exception niyad Wednesday #13
I want explanation not exploitation. Don't you? Good grief. What is going on? littlemissmartypants Wednesday #15
Done deal... littlemissmartypants Wednesday #14
Well the Republicans only needed 51 votes Farmer-Rick Wednesday #16
Wrote a few NewEnglandAutumn Wednesday #19
Conservative isn't necessarily equal to Trumper Deminpenn Wednesday #20
Hope you're proud of yourselves, Senate Democrats. Paladin Wednesday #21
I have nothing nice to say. Hotler Wednesday #25
What has happened to Martin Heinrich? Very disappointing. Clouds Passing Wednesday #26
Why would they do this? Emile Wednesday #28
We ask for opposition to fascism Miguelito Loveless Wednesday #30
WTF? karin_sj Wednesday #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»13 Senate Democrats Vote ...»Reply #23