Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: "Supreme Court, for now, blocks order for Trump administration to release billions in US foreign aid" [View all]GoreWon2000
(1,461 posts)47. SCOTUS Florida 2000 coup is alive and well in 2025
The 6 magas now on the SCOTUS wouldn't be there if it wasn't for the Rehnquist 5 SCOTUS coup throwing out we the people's votes in 2000. That made it possible for bushthief to appoint Roberts and Alito and create the Presidential election theft plan that tRump has been using ever since. I think tRump thinks he's got at least 5 and maybe 6 votes on the SCOTUS now who will gladly let him carry out his coup.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

"Supreme Court, for now, blocks order for Trump administration to release billions in US foreign aid" [View all]
yellow dahlia
Feb 26
OP
MY guess: The Infamous John Roberts needs time to prepare his deceptive wording for
Trust_Reality
Feb 27
#43
The near future will breakdown simply: those who want to live free, fascists, and those I don't care.
Magoo48
Feb 27
#55
Andrew Weissmann made that exact point on Lawrence - how quickly they move now.
yellow dahlia
Feb 26
#9
I know odds are against us at SC level, but they have blocked some -- but not all --trump suits
Silent Type
Feb 26
#10
KEY issue at the SC level and all lower fed. court levels: when has the SC ever literally enforced its rulings.
ancianita
Feb 27
#26
I always thought the courts were supposed to decide how much "injury" to either party would
Wonder Why
Feb 27
#29
The government is supposed to be representing the people of the country so I totally
Wonder Why
Feb 27
#33
The government represents the people? OK. But the USSC represents the Federalist Society. n/t
Safe as Milk
Feb 27
#59
I don't understand how SCOTUS can allow the US to renege on payment for work already accomplished or under
Martin68
Feb 27
#34
Call me naive, but I have a bit of hope that the SC will curb some of this insanity.
NH Ethylene
Feb 27
#36
Are they willing to be the ones that cause children to starve in the world,
yellow dahlia
Feb 27
#52
Impossible for good people to fathom, but that is exactly what their work does.
Kid Berwyn
Feb 27
#61