Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buddyzbuddy

(1,741 posts)
28. I personally have been consistent, period.
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 10:55 PM
Friday

I'm too stubborn not to be. I believe in lead or get out of the way. The party establishment seems to want to maintain the status quo. Nope, it's not working. The other side has chosen an emperor and given him all encompassing unlimited powers.
This is not a test, not a game. I'm so glad there are serious minds here. I would like nothing better than seeing our current leaders succeed. It doesn't have to be my way but it does have to be decisive. They must lead without hesitation not by what polls well or who's willing to pay better, but by what's the best way forward for the majority of us.
We, as a party have been playing catch-up for too long. It's an opportunity to lead and the status quo is a losing proposition. The establishment fears losing control. Control of what? We have to win to control anything.
You (collectively) are under the impression my remarks are strictly criticism, on the contrary, I state again and again, do better, assuming they will. I'm just one voter with a strong opinion. You don't have to like my opinion but if you wish it to be stifled, then you're no better than the other side who wants to squash freedom of speech.
If it makes you feel any better, I have serious issues with my 2 CA Democratic Senators voting in anyway that legitimizes crypto. But, I agree with more of the policies they choose to back than I disagree with so they get my vote.
It is my right and my duty to voice my concerns with any politician as I see fit.

I don't object to a difference of opinion and I'm not too proud to change my opinion when approached respectfully with convincing information to the contrary. And I have no problem apologizing when I may have stepped on toes. Hell, it's in my profile. Like many here, my patience is non existent and my rage lies just below the surface.
You guys can keep defending anybody you choose and I will keep hoping for good leadership. I will say this, I wouldn't want their job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's about time, Jeffries. Mamdani IS the correct choice for the Mayor of New York. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Friday #1
In 21, Hochul and Schumer didn't endorse Adams until 10/28 SocialDemocrat61 Friday #2
Hey DNC need more like Mamdani. gab13by13 Friday #3
Depends on where SocialDemocrat61 Friday #6
Not to mention the DNC ain't handpicking candidates for these sorts of races to begin with. W_HAMILTON Friday #12
I think there are SocialDemocrat61 Friday #13
I'm sure Jeffries decided that it's best to back he who is destined to be the winner. Intractable Friday #4
lol.. "...sure..",, huh... well that settles it.. Cha Friday #18
The timing of the endorsement is perfect Quiet Em Friday #5
Mamdani is ahead in the polls and going to win. rogue emissary Friday #7
It's never too late although it could have been sooner. Anyway, it's a good thing. Nanjeanne Friday #8
Actually the timing is great SocialDemocrat61 Friday #21
Ehhhhh.... mr715 Friday #27
Oh no! Teh Establishment's slacking off again, supposed to be TERRIFIED of and stop at nothing to thwart Mamdani. betsuni Friday #9
For anyone that knows how politics works and isn't neck deep in conspiracy theories... W_HAMILTON Friday #10
True SocialDemocrat61 Friday #11
Happens a lot. Rule of no benefit of the doubt, assume the worst, assume bad motivations, corruption, stupidity. betsuni Friday #14
Momdani must have a clue about the timing of endorsements since he Nixie Friday #32
Way to give a late, half assed endorsement. Buddyzbuddy Friday #15
He was waiting for early voting to begin, when his endorsement would have the most significance. W_HAMILTON Friday #16
I might have "heard what you were saying with an open mind Buddyzbuddy Friday #17
Who is us? W_HAMILTON Friday #19
No Hakeem Jeffries did NOT give a "half assed Cha Friday #20
As soon as he won the primary he should've given his full throated support, in my opinion. Buddyzbuddy Friday #22
I've never seen a local mayor's race SocialDemocrat61 Friday #24
I have seen a lot of mocking of those who would wish Jeffries have done it sooner AZProgressive Friday #26
Buffalo is irrelevant SocialDemocrat61 Friday #29
A few years ago when AOC didn't say she was going to endorse President Biden SunImp Friday #31
I personally have been consistent, period. Buddyzbuddy Friday #28
Attacking Jeffries one day because SocialDemocrat61 Friday #30
THANK YOU, For Explaining That Cha Yesterday #33
NO. I Thank Hakeem Jeffries for Endorsing NOW. nt. Cha Friday #25
About time. mr715 Friday #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hakeem Jeffries endorses ...»Reply #28