Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,549 posts)
61. Yes and no
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 07:46 PM
Oct 24

I'll often see an attorney's opinion cited in a debate here on some constitutional issue only to find that they specialize in family law or real estate law. Those are perfectly respectable professions, but the writer may have only taken a single semester of con law two or three decades ago. I often find that student I coach for moot court have a superior understanding of the issues involved than the person being cited as authoritative... despite lacking a law degree (or even an undergraduate degree at that point).

Kerr is the COO of an architecture firm that appears only to do home construction and home improvement projects. His graduate degrees are in business and operations management. That's entirely appropriate for his position, but the people in the firm actively doing architechture work have their advanced degrees in architecture... and even then I would take with a grain of salt their opinions on federal building cost estimates.

The more recent illustrations posted here are from McCrery Architects. McCrery is a professor of architecture at CU in DC who specializes in classic architecture and has worked on the US Capitol, the Capitol here in NC, and the Supreme Court.

Kerr is drawing conclusions on far too little data. He's already taken down the original images when he realized that they were discredited. He "stands by" his analysis... but it's demonstrably outside of his area of expertise.

As a simple example - consider his statement "the cost per square foot would be $3,333. No building costs anywhere near that. $1,000/sf is astronomical." Then consider the recent debate over renovations for the Federal Reserve HQ building that are currently underway. Trump was lambasting Powell over how wasteful the spending was and most of us here took the opposite position. Well... that's a $2.5 Billion dollar project... which renovates 402k sqft and expands an additional 440k sqft. That's $3k/sqft and half of it is renovation... not demolition and new construction.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great info, great post. Permanut Oct 24 #1
So what is the hypothesis? intrepidity Oct 24 #2
Maybe a new grift? Raven123 Oct 24 #23
a huge grift. the oompa loompa isn't sartisfied w/ the money he's already made selling his coins + nft's. pansypoo53219 Oct 24 #40
3 levels IbogaProject Oct 24 #55
The destruction of the East Wing is real. sop Oct 24 #3
This Layzeebeaver Saturday #73
They are playing a $300.million project by ear. Klarkashton Oct 24 #4
Embezzlement Diraven Oct 24 #27
Well, Not Exactly "By Ear," More Like by the Seat of His Soiled Diaper The Roux Comes First Oct 24 #32
Once the east wing was destroyed... ananda Oct 24 #45
"What is this, a center for ants?" leftstreet Oct 24 #5
Great movie orangecrush Oct 24 #37
I would bet that there are numerous below-grade levels planned. maxsolomon Oct 24 #6
"No markodochartaigh Oct 24 #7
Here we go!!! NJCher Oct 24 #8
How nice of you to claim Andrew Kerr is not real. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 24 #30
I don't think NJCher is saying Mr Kerr AllyCat Oct 24 #46
She says when the "REAL architects" speak up, as if Kerr is not real Bernardo de La Paz Oct 24 #51
Yes and no FBaggins Oct 24 #61
You make some good points and lay them out well. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 24 #64
still trying to figure out how to grift most of it back into his own pocket eShirl Oct 24 #9
Trump hired the contractor popsdenver Oct 24 #50
Seems like typical Facebook nonsense FBaggins Oct 24 #10
NYT article gifted for you Ellipsis Oct 24 #16
The WH has supplied a couple of renderings ("drawing" in your language). No idea what illustration FB has. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 24 #28
"Drawings" was Kerr's label. I just adopted it in my response on that point. FBaggins Oct 24 #62
You're the one spouting nonsense. Wiz Imp Oct 24 #53
Its been brought up elsewhere that tRumps ballroom exactlly mirrors putins ballroom in russia though its 5% bigger so yaesu Oct 24 #11
Yeah... that was mostly nonsense FBaggins Oct 24 #21
Don't bring facts and truth into a good meme lol... WarGamer Oct 24 #39
Post removed Post removed Oct 24 #57
The reason the price keeps going up daily Gaugamela Oct 24 #12
It will be built as cheaply as possible. Trump will pocket the extra money from the oligarchs' donations (bribes) Ocelot II Oct 24 #19
Exactly. Gaugamela Oct 24 #20
Yes the billionaires are standing in line waiting to throw money at it FakeNoose Oct 24 #24
I had wondered about that cost per square foot dsc Oct 24 #13
Chirst, now trump even has architects questioning whether building was destroyed and is being rebuilt to trump's specs. Silent Type Oct 24 #14
Very good chance the open wound will fester for months or years. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 24 #25
Most likely redoing the bunker under it to be more up to date nt EX500rider Oct 24 #15
Good idea Diraven Oct 24 #29
That's what I think; they're going deep. thought crime Oct 24 #38
Even a bunker won't survive a Ground Zero strike from a Russian nuclear ground burst EX500rider Oct 24 #44
And there is also a water table issue to an extent obamanut2012 Oct 24 #59
That's true Diraven Saturday #69
So said Thom Hartmann vapor2 Oct 24 #60
So it's a concept of a plan? Ocelot II Oct 24 #17
Just like health care. Ellipsis Oct 24 #18
So "sick f*ck" is now a legitimate measurement? BaronChocula Oct 24 #22
At a minimum, 50-60% of the cost is going into Trump's pocket. Scalded Nun Oct 24 #26
Building a throne room then? cstanleytech Oct 24 #31
Historian Doug Brinkley this a.m. on Morning Joe, got heated up about this allegorical oracle Oct 24 #33
Bottom line: NCDem47 Oct 24 #34
He left out a critical part... WarGamer Oct 24 #35
Wrong about what exactly? obamanut2012 Oct 24 #52
about cost estimates... WarGamer Oct 24 #65
All Chump wants to do is look at the carpet samples FakeNoose Oct 24 #66
Very interesting.... viva la Oct 24 #36
I clicked on the FB link and got a page that said, "Sorry, this content isn't available right now." ShazzieB Oct 24 #41
He might have changed privileges Ellipsis Oct 24 #42
That's okay. ShazzieB Saturday #67
Posted to another DU thread earlier today: evolves Oct 24 #43
Also gives whomever wants to target WH a great view of the rebuild... blue_jay Oct 24 #47
Fake ballroom... dlk Oct 24 #48
Because it is a scam misanthrope Oct 24 #49
The Epstein Ball Room Emile Oct 24 #54
Add it to the list of impeachable offenses Bluestocking Oct 24 #56
The Epstein Ballroom and Casino will never be completed. I doubt if the construction phase will actually begin. Ford_Prefect Oct 24 #58
Facebook link sez "content not available"..... n/t Dixiegrrrl Oct 24 #63
Don't forget the bunker. scipan Saturday #68
By the numbers - 90,000 sq. ft. is 2.07 acres. flashman13 Saturday #70
For a single-story building FBaggins Saturday #72
The Epstein Ballroom only exists in Trump's mind SARose Saturday #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Andrew Kerr- Architect - ...»Reply #61