Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(171,858 posts)
6. MaddowBlog-Trump's latest failed nominee makes the White House appear even more incompetent
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 02:55 PM
Wednesday

Paul Ingrassia’s nomination was an obvious debacle, but he’s only the latest addition to a growing list of personnel failures.

Every time a Trump nominee fails, the White House looks even more incompetent:
- Paul Ingrassia
- E.J. Antoni
- Brian Quintenz
- Matt Gaetz
- Dave Weldon
- Ed Martin
- Janette Nesheiwat
- Chad Chronister
- Kathleen Sgamma
- Jared Isaacman
- Elise Stefanik www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-10-22T12:59:19.307Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-latest-failed-nominee-makes-white-house-appear-even-incompetent-rcna239083

The process surrounding Donald Trump’s nominees tends to resemble an efficient assembly line. The president taps a loyalist with dubious qualifications; obedient Senate Republicans do what the White House tells them to do; and the nominees are confirmed to powerful positions that many of them clearly shouldn’t have.

Lately, however, the assembly line has broken down with surprising frequency. Take this week, for example. MSNBC reported:

President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Office of Special Counsel, Paul Ingrassia, withdrew his name from consideration on Tuesday after his confirmation looked destined to fail. In a social media post Tuesday night, Ingrassia said he would no longer attend his Senate confirmation hearing on Thursday ‘because unfortunately I do not have enough Republican votes at this time.’


The right-wing nominee’s record is filled with a great many ridiculous comments, but his head count was correct: Ingrassia’s history of radicalism made him one of the president’s most outlandish nominees to date, but after Politico reported on a group text in which Ingrassia acknowledged his “Nazi streak,” a variety of prominent GOP senators said they’d vote against him.....

But this is not, strictly speaking, simply a story about the demise of a ridiculous nomination. Rather, it’s equally important to appreciate the larger pattern — because while the conventional wisdom is that the Republican-led Senate reflexively confirms every misguided Trump nominee, that’s not entirely the case.

Earlier this month, for example, Brian Quintenz’s nomination to chair the Commodity Futures Trading Commission failed, and just a few days earlier, E.J. Antoni’s nomination to become the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics failed in the face of bipartisan opposition.

And while three nomination failures in three weeks is a lot, the problem has persisted for months. Indeed, the same list also includes Matt Gaetz, Dave Weldon, Ed Martin, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, Chad Chronister, Kathleen Sgamma and Jared Isaacman. (If we widen the aperture a bit, Elise Stefanik is also arguably part of the same group.)

The longer this list grows, the louder the concerns about rampant incompetence in the West Wing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Paul Ingrassia chara...»Reply #6