Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TACO BELLE [View all]I am not "calm" about theft and about environmental destruction, are you?
How I found out that an AI had stolen my art
So just out of curiosity I wanted to check if my art has been scraped from the web and used by Stable Diffusion. They graciously allow you to do that on haveibeentrained.com. Behind this site is a site called Spawning.ai, and they state in their Q&A that copyright is an outdated system that is a bad fit for the AI era. They also state that We believe that [ ] the artist community will benefit from this [AI] training to be consensual. Let me explain briefly why I shudder when I read this: As an artist, the intellectual property right is the most important right I have. If I cant manage the rights to my art and decide who is allowed to do what with it, it becomes worthless. If everyone can just take it, how am I going to get paid?
I didnt expect to find anything because my art isnt like the digital AI art style that you see a lot from these image generators. I go field sketching, and create scientific illustrations, Im not a very well known artist either. But I was curious. The search result was a surprise. The site found countless examples of my art, scraped directly from my website and from other places on the web. What I found really unsettling is that the algorithm grouped many of my pictures directly together Im not sure if it really does that based on my style or on alt tag or url properties it was creepy moment.
https://juliabausenhardt.com/how-ai-is-stealing-your-art/
So just out of curiosity I wanted to check if my art has been scraped from the web and used by Stable Diffusion. They graciously allow you to do that on haveibeentrained.com. Behind this site is a site called Spawning.ai, and they state in their Q&A that copyright is an outdated system that is a bad fit for the AI era. They also state that We believe that [ ] the artist community will benefit from this [AI] training to be consensual. Let me explain briefly why I shudder when I read this: As an artist, the intellectual property right is the most important right I have. If I cant manage the rights to my art and decide who is allowed to do what with it, it becomes worthless. If everyone can just take it, how am I going to get paid?
I didnt expect to find anything because my art isnt like the digital AI art style that you see a lot from these image generators. I go field sketching, and create scientific illustrations, Im not a very well known artist either. But I was curious. The search result was a surprise. The site found countless examples of my art, scraped directly from my website and from other places on the web. What I found really unsettling is that the algorithm grouped many of my pictures directly together Im not sure if it really does that based on my style or on alt tag or url properties it was creepy moment.
https://juliabausenhardt.com/how-ai-is-stealing-your-art/
As Use of A.I. Soars, So Does the Energy and Water It Requires
Generative artificial intelligence uses massive amounts of energy for computation and data storage and millions of gallons of water to cool the equipment at data centers. Now, legislators and regulators in the U.S. and the EU are starting to demand accountability.
Two months after its release in November 2022, OpenAIs ChatGPT had 100 million active users, and suddenly tech corporations were racing to offer the public more generative A.I. Pundits compared the new technologys impact to the Internet, or electrification, or the Industrial Revolution or the discovery of fire.
Time will sort hype from reality, but one consequence of the explosion of artificial intelligence is clear: this technologys environmental footprint is large and growing.
A.I. use is directly responsible for carbon emissions from non-renewable electricity and for the consumption of millions of gallons of fresh water, and it indirectly boosts impacts from building and maintaining the power-hungry equipment on which A.I. runs. As tech companies seek to embed high-intensity A.I. into everything from resume-writing to kidney transplant medicine and from choosing dog food to climate modeling, they cite many ways A.I. could help reduce humanitys environmental footprint. But legislators, regulators, activists, and international organizations now want to make sure the benefits arent outweighed by A.I.s mounting hazards.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-climate-energy-emissions
Generative artificial intelligence uses massive amounts of energy for computation and data storage and millions of gallons of water to cool the equipment at data centers. Now, legislators and regulators in the U.S. and the EU are starting to demand accountability.
Two months after its release in November 2022, OpenAIs ChatGPT had 100 million active users, and suddenly tech corporations were racing to offer the public more generative A.I. Pundits compared the new technologys impact to the Internet, or electrification, or the Industrial Revolution or the discovery of fire.
Time will sort hype from reality, but one consequence of the explosion of artificial intelligence is clear: this technologys environmental footprint is large and growing.
A.I. use is directly responsible for carbon emissions from non-renewable electricity and for the consumption of millions of gallons of fresh water, and it indirectly boosts impacts from building and maintaining the power-hungry equipment on which A.I. runs. As tech companies seek to embed high-intensity A.I. into everything from resume-writing to kidney transplant medicine and from choosing dog food to climate modeling, they cite many ways A.I. could help reduce humanitys environmental footprint. But legislators, regulators, activists, and international organizations now want to make sure the benefits arent outweighed by A.I.s mounting hazards.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-climate-energy-emissions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Go read that thread and that particular reply. Please. These are very calm replies I'm posting.
highplainsdem
May 30
#9
The wording is calm, mostly due to years on debate teams and running forums online. I prefer to
highplainsdem
May 30
#19
Just realized you might not have meant your questioning of the word "calm" to refer to my using it as
highplainsdem
May 30
#20
Thanks! And I'm sorry I misunderstood. Those are great links you posted, and I hope people will look
highplainsdem
May 30
#40
I Post What I Find If You Don't Like It Just Block It - Disparaging Other's Posts As "AI Slop Seems Needlesly Derogatory
MayReasonRule
May 30
#10
It looks like typical AI-generated slop. There are very good reasons NOT to post it. Please see that
highplainsdem
May 30
#11
It's a clear piss take of Trump, and you think "they might not even be liberal"?
muriel_volestrangler
May 30
#23
GenAI can be used to present any viewpoint, and the user doesn't have to agree with the viewpoint
highplainsdem
May 30
#24
The image is hosted on imgur. There's no one trying to get views with it.
muriel_volestrangler
May 30
#28
Again, see this thread and the replies - and reply 5 in particular - and maybe that will help you finally
highplainsdem
May 30
#29
He asked me not to post a separate OP about it. I wonder why you don't think people should know
highplainsdem
May 30
#33
I simply recommended people look at what he said. Why are you defending posting AI slop?
highplainsdem
May 30
#38