Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TommieMommy

(1,998 posts)
8. Holy crap 😨
Wed May 28, 2025, 05:53 AM
Wednesday

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bookmarking for Boycotts oasis Wednesday #1
"VAnity Fair". WTH were they Thinking?!! Cha Wednesday #2
I think that must be the paper napkins or the bras, not the magazine. VTderry Wednesday #15
The list is very flawed, completely unreliable, and long debunked here. The OP is misinformation, simple as that. Celerity Wednesday #23
Here is an article that reviewed this list chowder66 Wednesday #3
I like the breakdown kkmarie Wednesday #6
You're welcome. chowder66 Wednesday #44
Thank you. I like to aim my ire accurately -- it's more productive that way. Hekate Wednesday #11
Agreed. chowder66 Wednesday #45
Thanks. This is helpful. Easterncedar Wednesday #20
You're welcome. I thought so as well. chowder66 Wednesday #46
Very helpful. Snopes does good work mnhtnbb Wednesday #22
They do. It would take a long time going through opensecrets so I'm glad they did the work. chowder66 Wednesday #47
Good to know! Thank you so much! liberalla Wednesday #38
You're welcome. chowder66 Wednesday #43
Oh my. Some of them I can understand, but others are crazy! C Moon Wednesday #4
the list is bollocks in many cases nt Celerity Wednesday #7
oh ffs, this list (and to top it off you did not even post a link) has been debunked for ages, please self-delete Celerity Wednesday #5
Absolutely. A lot of those companies in that list always donate to BOTH candidates in an election, which JohnSJ Wednesday #16
the list also often uses individual employees' contributions, not the firms' corporate donations Celerity Wednesday #17
Thanks. Very misleading, and actually I think should be self-deleted. JohnSJ Wednesday #19
here is one of my old replies in another OP thread about this back in 2024 Celerity Wednesday #21
Check out Ace Hardware blubunyip Wednesday #35
Major firms have a wide variety of political ideologies spread out within their employee population. Celerity Wednesday #36
The disclaimer states blubunyip Wednesday #40
I am going to side with logic and not give in to confirmation bias, but you do you Celerity Wednesday #42
mmmkay blubunyip Wednesday #49
Holy crap 😨 TommieMommy Wednesday #8
Will be cross checking with the Snopes post. Thanks to both of you. Hekate Wednesday #9
Molson Beer a Canadian company supported Emile Wednesday #10
They merged with Coors genxlib Wednesday #24
Goods Unite Us app Golfnbrew Wednesday #12
Goods Unite Us is a flawed app/source, and has been debunked here for some time Celerity Wednesday #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Norbert Wednesday #13
I am not sure where you got that list, but there are a lot of companies in that list who donated to both JohnSJ Wednesday #14
A list of those that didn't would be shorter, I think... doc03 Wednesday #25
Thus list makes no sense. How is it compiled? What data? Callie1979 Wednesday #26
See post #3 above. subterranean Wednesday #27
Thanks! "Inaccurate & unreliable". Kinda what I expected. Callie1979 Wednesday #33
Kick! SheltieLover Wednesday #28
Bausch & Lomb - their AREDS formulas - you can get them cheaper at Walmart, which is also evil. CousinIT Wednesday #29
There are a lot of companies k_buddy762 Wednesday #30
Be Cautious About Accepting It ProfessorGAC Wednesday #31
CEOS that "lean" Dem blubunyip Wednesday #34
Whatever ProfessorGAC Wednesday #39
Why is that blubunyip Wednesday #41
I think most CEOs k_buddy762 Wednesday #37
I looked up some of these blubunyip Wednesday #32
I hope someone compiles a list of alternatives pat_k Wednesday #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #8