Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Trust_Reality

(2,179 posts)
21. Indeed, the screening recommendations are bad advice.
Mon May 26, 2025, 12:37 PM
Monday

I don't know if they are "out of date," I'm not sure when they were declared.

The idea of stopping the screening after age 70 is based on the claim that "you will most likely die from something else before you die from prostate cancer because it is usually slow growing." That does not sound like medicine. It sounds like money, as in medical insurance expenses. (I assume there are data to support it.) That does not take into account that cancer any place in one's body presents a reduced level of overall health and well being. So, while waiting for something else to kill you, you are probably experiencing a reduced quality of life.

At age 79, I had to demand a limited biopsy from a prostate surgeon I was referred to. I finally told him my parents lived to be 93 and 97. There was a pretty good probability I might live quite a lot longer. (Statistics and probability are heavily involved in today's medical recommendations. Congratulations, you are a data point.)

I had had some urinary symptoms - blood in urine. A urology PA mentioned an MRI as one of the options. I jumped at that unobtrusive option, and it found the prostate cancer. It was well contained with moderate risk (biopsy found Gleason 3 + 4). The tumor location was one that could be felt via physical exam in the most common area for prostate cancer to occur. (Hurray, I fit the data.)

At this point the options were "active surveillance" with frequent biopsies, or surgery, or radiation. There are other options as well which I looked for on my own. The surgeon's PA recommended radiation - if I did not want to "wait and watch".

After much research, some of which had been done years before (I had a history of prostate symptoms), I chose proton beam radiation which required living in another state for 6 weeks and three or four preliminary visits. Half way through the treatments I began feeling better. After the final treatment, I had enough energy to immediately load up the minivan myself and take off. Preparing for the daily radiation treatments and coping with some intestinal irritation was a nuisance, but otherwise the whole process went well. That was 2.5 years ago. I'm doing very well and planning to play (fairly competitive) pickleball for many more years.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sudden diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer all too common struggle4progress Sunday #1
Sounds a lot like Ovarian Cancer in women. slightlv Sunday #9
That guidance against PSA tests is outrageous Bluetus Monday #19
Guidelines are *Guidelines* Doctoris Extincti Monday #24
My situation is similar Bluetus Monday #25
Totally agree with you! Doctoris Extincti Monday #26
Many 70 year olds can live until 90+ choie Monday #27
Well, the very slow-growing forms of prostate cancer Bluetus Monday #30
Why Biden may not have known about his cancer until recently struggle4progress Sunday #2
I believed Joe Biden without proof. Because he is an honest man. Walleye Sunday #3
Me too. Makes all the difference. calimary Sunday #11
People should learn to trust their instincts when it comes to truth and lies Walleye Sunday #13
I am not sure the issue is instincts Bluetus Monday #20
Yes, we simply need to recognize what honesty is to start with Walleye Monday #22
How Doctors Treat Aggressive Prostate Cancer Like Joe Biden's struggle4progress Sunday #4
Thank you for all the information. sheshe2 Sunday #5
I have been waiting for someone MLWR Sunday #6
Hear, hear peggysue2 Sunday #7
Mahalo for all these Informative articles Cha Sunday #8
Good article. One everybody should read, whether they have cancer or don't, calimary Sunday #10
The Heart of the Problem DET Sunday #12
A test of psa and free psa is more meaningful, and cost is essentially the same for psa/free psa test... NowsTheTime Monday #15
Indeed, the screening recommendations are bad advice. Trust_Reality Monday #21
Good information -- (also much needed). Thank you. liberalla Monday #14
It's not just prostate cancer - this happens TBF Monday #16
Same here. ChazInAz Monday #17
Hmmmm Littlered Monday #18
Obviously, a "routine" blood test is important! young_at_heart Monday #23
Seems like many Littlered Monday #29
k&r Nimble_Idea Monday #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have the same cancer as...»Reply #21