Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Tickle

(4,131 posts)
7. As a liberal who values transparency
Sun May 25, 2025, 08:23 AM
Sunday

and accountability in leadership, it’s deeply concerning to consider the possibility that the White House may have known about President Biden’s prostate cancer diagnosis and chose to withhold that information from the public. While it's understandable that private health matters deserve a degree of confidentiality, the health of the sitting president is not just a personal issue — it has direct implications for national stability, foreign policy, and public trust. If the administration was aware of a diagnosis and failed to disclose it, that choice reflects a calculated political decision that prioritizes optics over openness.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have a question on Pres...»Reply #7