Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NYT sanewashing knows no bounds [View all] senseandsensibility Apr 3 OP
The NYTs apologists here will just poo-poo it and tell us jrthin Apr 3 #1
Let them read art senseandsensibility Apr 3 #2
The cases they are failing at are the cases that seriously hurt us and can destroy. jrthin Apr 3 #8
Is the article not fact-based? maxsolomon Apr 3 #11
It doesn't contain any criticism; it's pretty much "he's in control now" muriel_volestrangler Apr 3 #14
Thank you senseandsensibility Apr 3 #17
Please stop it. It doesn't matter if the article is accurate or not. jrthin Apr 3 #15
A lot of work goes into writing headlines senseandsensibility Apr 3 #16
Responding to Reply #2. maxsolomon Apr 3 #18
But most don't read full articles SocialDemocrat61 Apr 3 #19
There seem to be a few SocialDemocrat61 Apr 3 #12
I agree that is strange senseandsensibility Apr 3 #13
I wish I could recommend your post a millions times! jrthin Apr 3 #21
I guess that on December 7, 1941, the Japanese demonstrated that steel is Wonder Why Apr 3 #3
Perfect! senseandsensibility Apr 3 #4
Jeebus, that is a terrible headline Redleg Apr 3 #5
Too true senseandsensibility Apr 3 #7
Several respondents called them out for it AStern Apr 3 #6
Glad to hear they were called out senseandsensibility Apr 3 #20
Should be 'Appetite for Destruction' SocialDemocrat61 Apr 3 #9
Welcome to the Jungle EnergizedLib Apr 3 #10
They may be afraid of the ire of Trump, but ReRe Apr 3 #22
Probably both senseandsensibility Apr 3 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT sanewashing knows no ...»Reply #9