Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumLawrence: White House effectively says NYT reporters must have tapes of Situation Room meeting - The Last Word - MS NOW
From suspending Habeas Corpus to invoking the Insurrection Act, MS NOW's Lawrence O'Donnell examines new reporting from The New York Times' Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan detailing White House discussions that alarmed even some Trump officials.
Lawrence says, "it is easy to imagine what goes on in the Trump White House: discussions of trampling the Constitution, violating the law, and crushing our rights." - Aired on 06/15/2026.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence: White House effectively says NYT reporters must have tapes of Situation Room meeting - The Last Word - MS NOW (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Monday
OP
SSJVegeta
(3,384 posts)1. Am i wrong to assume they are terrified for the political ramifications and less about the actual national security
Stuff?
Like: they say trump and Miller seriously spoke about suspending the constitution. If there are tapes: Could Trump actually be done?
Rhiannon12866
(260,640 posts)2. We can certainly hope, but would this have the support in Congress?
Nixon was done when his own party turned against him, but we haven't seen the same advocacy for the Rule of Law among the current Republican party.
SSJVegeta
(3,384 posts)3. The situation room is supposed to always be leak proof
They would likely be confident to say things that they know people in their party would condemn. Like proposing to suspend the constitution.