Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumTotal porn ban proposed by Michigan lawmakers. (Fox2, Detroit)
https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/total-porn-ban-proposed-michigan-lawmakersadults and children.
Well, that solves the "age verification" problem.
Look up "unintended consequences" if you will.
Reminder, this is only a proposal, referred to committee.
LANSING, Mich. (FOX 2) - Michigan lawmakers proposed a bill last week banning porn.
House Bill 4938, called the "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act," would prohibit the distribution of "real, animated, digitally generated, written, or auditory" depictions of sexual acts. The bill breaks down the types of acts covered, including intercourse and masturbation.
The bill also includes a section that takes aim at transgender individuals by prohibiting material "that includes a disconnection between biology and gender by an individual of 1 biological sex imitating, depicting, or representing himself or herself to be of the other biological sex."
snip
The bill would require internet service providers in Michigan to use filters to prevent people from seeing the prohibited material.
If the bill were to become law, violators could be looking at prison time or hefty fines. Distributing the prohibited material or making it available online would carry a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and/or a $100,000 fine. If more than 100 pieces of prohibited material are involved, that penalty jumps to 25 years in prison and/or a fine up to $125,000.
The bill also includes a section that takes aim at transgender individuals by prohibiting material "that includes a disconnection between biology and gender by an individual of 1 biological sex imitating, depicting, or representing himself or herself to be of the other biological sex."
snip
The bill would require internet service providers in Michigan to use filters to prevent people from seeing the prohibited material.
If the bill were to become law, violators could be looking at prison time or hefty fines. Distributing the prohibited material or making it available online would carry a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and/or a $100,000 fine. If more than 100 pieces of prohibited material are involved, that penalty jumps to 25 years in prison and/or a fine up to $125,000.
What's next:
The bill was referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
No meetings have been scheduled for the committee to review the proposed law.
Perhaps some sessions to review material in question?
ETA: spirited discussion on Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45255921
					
						13 replies
						
							 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
				 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
						Total porn ban proposed by Michigan lawmakers. (Fox2, Detroit) (Original Post)
						usonian
						Sep 15
						OP
					
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
        
        Right. I don't care for porn, so I don't go looking for it. Besides the SCOTUS won't permit that law ...
        marble falls
        Sep 15
        #5
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
        
        I remember the Moral Majority tried this years ago and found out ya can't legislate morality
        Deuxcents
        Sep 15
        #11
      
      
      
      
      
        
        The sponsors want to restrict porn so they are the only ones who can see it
        bucolic_frolic
        Sep 16
        #13
      
      
msongs
(72,733 posts)1. does that include melania   nt
        Irish_Dem
(77,018 posts)7. When a gold digging ho makes good, she starts calling herself a model.
        Srkdqltr
(9,052 posts)2. Is that possible?  Or magical thinking?
        usonian
(22,000 posts)3. Well, they could have a contest instead of a lottery. "Master of your domain"
        
ImNotGod
(1,194 posts)4. Its official name is the religious nuts wishful thinking bill, nt
        spooky3
(38,049 posts)6. They're the biggest consumers of it. Nt
        marble falls
(68,992 posts)5. Right. I don't care for porn, so I don't go looking for it. Besides the SCOTUS won't permit that law ...
        ... it's ruled against it many times.
Irish_Dem
(77,018 posts)8. Why is the GOP so darn obsessed with sex?
        usonian
(22,000 posts)9. Every accusation is a confession.
        I grew up Catholic. You probably did, too. (Irish Dem? sure).
And you know the consequences of their policies. 
Irish_Dem
(77,018 posts)10. Yep MAGA cult is highly repressed.
        And acts it out all the time.
Ha yes raised Catholic. What else in an Irish family. 
Deuxcents
(24,572 posts)11. I remember the Moral Majority tried this years ago and found out ya can't legislate morality
        We used to say the moral majority is not moral or the majority
usonian
(22,000 posts)12. Churches found long ago that mandated morality is a means of control.
        One of many. But the leaders are exempt. No need to give examples. 
Every accusation is a confession. Good people are enablers, uplifters and examples. 
Small shits want to control, cut down and be exempt from all rules (OK, "privilege" ) 
Never changes. 
bucolic_frolic
(53,004 posts)13. The sponsors want to restrict porn so they are the only ones who can see it
        In the name of regulation, of course!








