Top Treasury Lawyer Resigns After Creation of 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Source: New York Times
Top Treasury Lawyer Resigns After Creation of 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Brian Morrissey, the department's general counsel, stepped down hours after the Trump administration announced the $1.8 billion fund.

The Treasury Department's general counsel, Brian Morrissey, resigned on Monday, three people familiar with the move said. Jason Andrew for The New York Times
By Andrew Duehren
Reporting from Washington
May 18, 2026
The top lawyer at the Treasury Department stepped down on Monday in the wake of the creation of a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization fund" that could soon make payments to President Trump's political allies, according to three people familiar with the move.
Brian Morrissey, the Treasury's general counsel, resigned from the position seven months after he was confirmed to it by the Senate and just hours after the Trump administration announced the fund on Monday.
Mr. Morrissey did not respond to requests for comment. A Treasury spokesman said, "Mr. Morrissey has served the United States Treasury with both honor and integrity. We wish him all the best in his next endeavors." In his resignation letter, Mr. Morrissey said he was grateful to have worked for Mr. Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, according to two people familiar with the letter.
{snip}
The Justice Department is creating the anti-weaponization fund as part of an agreement to settle a lawsuit that Mr. Trump brought against the Internal Revenue Service, which falls under the umbrella of the Treasury Department. In his suit, Mr. Trump accused the I.R.S. of not doing enough to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of his tax information during his first term. The president dropped the suit on Monday under scrutiny from a judge who questioned whether Mr. Trump could legally sue a government agency he controls.
Andrew Duehren covers tax policy for The Times from Washington.
https://www.nytimes.com/by/andrew-duehren
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/business/anti-weaponization-fund-brian-morrissey-treasury.html
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/treasury-lawyer-quits-as-government-settles-trump-irs-suit-0658a44a
*******
Us * Law
Treasury Lawyer Quits as Government Settles Trump IRS Suit
Trump appointee leaves as administration creates $1.8 billion payment fund
By Richard Rubin and C. Ryan Barber
https://www.wsj.com/news/author/richard-rubin
https://www.wsj.com/news/author/cryan-barber
Updated May 18, 2026 11:41 pm ET

Brian Morrissey, who was Treasury Department general counsel. Eric Lee/Bloomberg News
WASHINGTON--The Treasury Department's top lawyer resigned Monday as the government announced a controversial settlement with President Trump, according to people familiar with his departure.
Brian Morrissey joined the Trump administration last year as the president's pick to be Treasury Department's general counsel, after previously serving at the agency and at the Justice Department during Trump's first term. A former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, Morrissey didn't respond to a request for comment late Monday.
{snip}
Copyright 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
******
democrank
(12,680 posts)More BS.
LymphocyteLover
(10,148 posts)SpankMe
(3,761 posts)It's standard conops in gov't service of this kind.
NJCher
(43,522 posts)Any lawyer participating in this would lose their license to practice law. This is why he is resigning:
Harry Litman says it is a fully impeachable offense.
Jamie Raskin reiterated last night that it is unconstitutional.
mahatmakanejeeves
(70,719 posts)@harrylitman.bsky.social
DOJ announces 1.8B (1.776B if that doesn't make you puke) fund for victims of lawfare/weaponization, supposedly as part of Trump settlement. but That's 100% improper as a settlement of Trump's bogus lawsuit. Can only settle viable lawsuits, and htis is isn't one. This is going to be a fight.
12:00 PM · May 18, 2026
DOJ announces 1.8B (1.776B if that doesn't make you puke) fund for victims of lawfare/weaponization, supposedly as part of Trump settlement. but That's 100% improper as a settlement of Trump's bogus lawsuit. Can only settle viable lawsuits, and htis is isn't one. This is going to be a fight.
— Harry Litman (@harrylitman.bsky.social) 2026-05-18T16:00:19.021Z
NJCher
(43,522 posts)I had not yet caught up on Harry this morning. In his podcast two days ago, he was so angry that he ended it with a litany of swear words the likes of which I have never seen from him.
mahatmakanejeeves
(70,719 posts)And good morning.
NJCher
(43,522 posts)There are four judges so far who have weighed in on this, and it is fairly clear that they see this as a scam.
So, per Harrys remarks in the Bluesky post, if this is litigated, Trump might not get too far.
erronis
(24,529 posts)Joyce Vance - Kleptocracy - https://joycevance.substack.com/p/kleptocracy
Ms. Toad
(38,822 posts)That flips the law on its head.
You settle a case to resolve a lawsuit, not after the lawsuit is dismissed. Especially when the defendant is a government entity, or a publicly owned company, you can't create a legally binding settlement at a time a lawsuit doesn't exist.
I can't imagine this will hold.
LymphocyteLover
(10,148 posts)dave99
(270 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(70,719 posts)Published: March 27, 2025
Author: Notre Dame Law School

President Trump has nominated Brian Morrissey to serve as General Counsel at the Department of the Treasury. Morrissey is currently a partner in the law firm of Sidley Austin LLP. During President Trumps first term, Morrissey served as Deputy General Counsel for the Treasury Department and in senior Department of Justice roles. Morrissey has broad experience in government and private practice handling complex litigation, government investigations, and regulatory matters. He served as a law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court and Judge Diarmuid OScannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Ray Bruns
(6,736 posts)ToxMarz
(3,065 posts)SpankMe
(3,761 posts)There's no line item in the congressionally-aproved budget for this. But, he's going to allocate the funds anyway. This is a literal and direct violation of Article 1, Section 9 of the constitution, to wit "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law."
But, who's going to hold him to account? If congress can't impeach, they can sue and have SCOTUS rule on it. Can the Dems sue, even though they're not the party in charge?
BradBo
(1,061 posts)FakeNoose
(42,406 posts)Maybe Brian Morrissey will show us that he has some scruples after all.
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,024 posts)Wednesdays
(23,126 posts)pansypoo53219
(23,169 posts)maxsolomon
(39,124 posts)Stop rounding up, NYT.
dlk
(13,340 posts)What could possibly go wrong?
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.
