Laden Iranian ships depart Chinese port tied to key military chemicals

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Source: Washington Post

Visual Forensics

Laden Iranian ships depart Chinese port tied to key military chemicals

Experts said the vessels are probably carrying a key precursor for rocket fuel, making it notable that Beijing let them sail while the U.S. and Iran are at war.

Today at 5:31 p.m. EST
6 min


Two cargo ships — the Hamouna (left) and the Shabdis (right) — owned by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines pass each other in the ocean off of Gaolan Port in Zhuhai, China, on Feb. 19. (Planet Labs)

By Joyce Sohyun Lee and Meg Kelly

Two ships owned by an Iranian company that the United States has accused of supplying material to Tehran’s ballistic missile program departed a Chinese chemical-storage port this week laden with cargo and headed for Iran, according to a Washington Post analysis of ship-tracking data, satellite imagery and Treasury Department records. ... The vessels are part of the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), a state-owned company under U.S., British and European Union sanctions that has been described by the U.S. State Department as the “preferred shipping line for Iranian proliferators and procurement agents.”

The Shabdis and the Barzin — which can carry up to 6,500 and 14,500 20-foot-long containers, respectively — had docked at the Gaolan port in Zhuhai, a city on China’s southeastern coast. Experts told The Post that Gaolan is a loading port for chemicals including sodium perchlorate, a key precursor for solid rocket fuel that Iran desperately needs for its missile program.

A dozen other IRISL ships have visited the port since the start of the year. But experts said it would be notable for Beijing to allow any vessels to depart in this moment bound for Iran with weapons-related material as they expected China — America’s chief and most powerful strategic rival — to be wary of such an action while the United States and Iran are in direct combat.

“China could have held these vessels at port, imposed an administrative delay, invented a customs hold — any number of bureaucratic tools, but didn’t,” said Isaac Kardon, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, to The Post. “That’s a deliberate policy choice made during an active war in which Beijing publicly calls for restraint.”

{snip}

Alex Horton contributed to this report.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/03/07/laden-iranian-ships-depart-chinese-port-tied-key-military-chemicals/

---

https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/joyce-lee/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/meg-kelly/

[cachukis]

1. Holy cadookalas!

[OC375]

2. You don't have to go home but you can't stay here

“Contract fulfilled. Here’s your stuff. Bye.”

That’s my guess.

[patphil]

4. China got paid, or they wouldn't let the ship go.

Next port of call for that ship is Davey Jones Locker.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

5. That's my prediction also.

The US Navy, despite all the negative comments, is a highly effective fighting force and will dispatch this weapons carrier to the bottom of the ocean.

[OC375]

6. That would be me guess as well

I’d hope we try to seize it rather than sink it, as it full of fuel and presumably non-combatants.

[Wonder Why]

9. Non-combatants? Isn't that what Hogsbreath calls legitimate targets?

[MarineCombatEngineer]

10. How are they non combatants if they already know what the BoL is?

At least the Capt. and First Officer know what they're transporting and are putting the crew, who may or may not know what the shipment consists of, in danger of being injured or killed.

[OC375]

11. They probably aren't, IMHO.

But, I was trying to be charitable in my estimation nonetheless. Regardless, that ship never sees Iran. They should surrender and dock far from the fray.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

12. More than fair enough.

[EX500rider]

13. Wonder how truthful this report is:

Iranian sailor killed on Dena told father US warned ship before strike

An Iranian sailor who was killed when the warship Dena was struck by the US near Sri Lanka had called his father shortly beforehand, saying American forces had issued two warnings for the crew to abandon the vessel, a source close to the family told Iran International.

The Iranian navy warship's commander refused to allow the crew to abandon Dena despite the imminent threat, the source added.

The sailor’s father said some crew members argued with the commander, and the 32 crew members who survived were mainly sailors who managed to escape on lifeboats, according to the source.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603071125

[MarineCombatEngineer]

14. Hard to tell these days, but I tend to think that the warning was given but ignored by the Iranian Capt. nt

[EX500rider]

15. Of course you can bet that everyone who instantly believed some random X post about the desalinization attack

Would claim this must be BS and they need more proof Etc LOL

[MarineCombatEngineer]

3. I seriously doubt that this shipment will make it back to Iran,

the US Navy, know knowing what and where this ship is headed and the BoL is, will ever make it to an Iranian port.

[RussBLib]

7. If we know about it

…you know THEY know about it. Hegseth must be getting a boner.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

8. Ewww, there's an image I now can't get out of my mind.

Thanks a lot for that.

[RussBLib]

16. YW - have they sunk yet?

Wonder how long it takes to travel from China to Iran, by sea? Several days at least.

https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1