'We're not at war right now': House Speaker Johnson makes stunning claim after Trump's barrage on Iran
Source: Independent
House Speaker Mike Johnson rejected the idea that the United States is at war with Iran despite President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth both saying the U.S. is at war.
The speaker delivered his weekly press conference, his first since Trump and Israel launched strikes on Iran over the weekend, and rejected the notion that the House needed to have a vote on the War Powers Act as the U.S. Senate was expected to later Wednesday.
Were not at war right now, were four days into a very specific, clear mission and operation, Johnson told reporters. Rather, Johnson maintained that Iran had declared war on the United States after the U.S. strikes that wiped out their leadership structure.
The claim comes despite the president's announcement of strikes on Iran alongside Israel. The White House and the Pentagon have dubbed the mission Operation Epic Fury.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/not-war-now-house-speaker-160948266.html
Putting your lips on Trump's ass has damaged your brain Johnson
Solly Mack
(96,779 posts)riversedge
(80,395 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,340 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,340 posts)relayerbob
(7,410 posts)ananda
(34,820 posts)then Congress can't abdicate its responsibility
in that regard.
Right.
mdbl
(8,505 posts)Kid Berwyn
(24,007 posts)Spineless weasel, FTR.
Ray Bruns
(6,202 posts)Ray Bruns
(6,202 posts)How did Mike Johnson say all that with Trumps dick in his mouth?
orangecrush
(29,868 posts)BattleRow
(2,236 posts)FakeNoose
(41,139 posts)
AZ8theist
(7,241 posts)
cstanleytech
(28,387 posts)Wonder Why
(6,790 posts)bluedigger
(17,426 posts)First time since '45, if memory serves. I guess our definitions of wartime activities differs.
BattleRow
(2,236 posts)struggle4progress
(125,954 posts)That's an act of war in anybody's book
in2herbs
(4,372 posts)going to get to volunteer to fight? I'm pretty sure non-whites won't volunteer (and I hope they don't.)
Uncle Joe
(64,824 posts)Last edited Wed Mar 4, 2026, 10:08 PM - Edit history (1)
killing everyone in his administration, we wouldn't be at war with said country because said country was just doing a "very specific clear mission."
I've heard of turning the other cheek but I can't imagine that even "Johnson's Baby Powder" would take the stratospheric road in that case.
Thanks for the thread Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Dan
(5,072 posts)On a fact finding mention on the ground.
chouchou
(3,059 posts)"On the other hand, we're not actually married"
sarisataka
(22,449 posts)The GOP members have neutered themselves. They may not have passed an Enabling Act but it is clear they are going to let Trump rule by fiat.
Aussie105
(7,803 posts)Not really a war as such, people aren't really being killed, things really aren't being bombed and blown up.
The dead are crisis actors who go home when the cameras are off, the buildings in rubble is just CGI.
George Orwell smiles!
The double talk is just his style.
It's operation 'slightly angry', not Epic fury.
Made for the evening news for US MAGA propaganda believer consumption.
Other sane media sources like Al Jazeera, BBC (UK), DW seem to think it's an undeclared war.
Trump and Johnson need a stiff word with them to get them to see things more clearly.
The question no one, not even George Orwell, asked directly:
Who benefits?
BootinUp
(51,127 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,572 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,760 posts)LudwigPastorius
(14,530 posts)Do tell, Mikey...cause nobody else knows what that could be.
BigmanPigman
(54,977 posts)Aussie105
(7,803 posts)when he sent boots on the ground to Iraq to find WMDs that didn't exist?
It was only some 20 years ago.
BidenRocks
(3,117 posts)Ignoring the obvious or trying to sell us a load of crap?
We're not buying!