Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(153,292 posts)
Tue May 27, 2025, 07:48 PM Tuesday

Trump's 'Big Beautiful' Budget Bill Also Includes This Measure to Kneecap Federal Judges' Power

Source: MEDIAite

May 27th, 2025, 3:39 pm


House Republicans added a provision to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which has raised eyebrows among political observers and reporters in recent days. While much of the discussion around the sweeping tax and spending bill has focused on how it impacts the deficit, one paragraph has largely gone unnoticed – except by those who follow politics with a magnifying glass.

USA Today columnist Chris Brennan, a former political reporter for The Philadelphia Inquirer, highlighted the alarming paragraph over the weekend. “One paragraph, on pages 562 and 563 of the 1,116-page bill, raised alarms for reasons that have nothing to do with America’s budget or safety-net programs or debt. That paragraph invokes a federal rule for civil court procedures, requiring anyone seeking an injunction or temporary restraining order to block an action by the Trump administration to post a financial bond,” Brennan wrote.

The provision of the bill reads: “No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), whether issued prior to, on, or subsequent to the date of enactment of this section.”

Brennan went on to explain that the real-world impact of the paragraph buried deep in the middle of the massive bill could mean that Americans without financial means won’t be able to challenge the Trump administration in court – and those who do have the means will have to pay more.

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trumps-big-beautiful-budget-bill-also-includes-this-measure-to-kneecap-federal-judges-power/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's 'Big Beautiful' Budget Bill Also Includes This Measure to Kneecap Federal Judges' Power (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP
YUP but spineless repugs will continue to be complicit vapor2 Tuesday #1
They arent spineless quakerboy Tuesday #3
The courts would overturn the clause before the ink was dry. Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
This and the fucking 10-year AI regulation ban have no fucking business being in this fucking thing. Invoke the Byrd Act Karasu Tuesday #4

Fiendish Thingy

(19,399 posts)
2. The courts would overturn the clause before the ink was dry.
Tue May 27, 2025, 07:55 PM
Tuesday

Separation of Powers and equal protection for starters.

Read an article the other day where federal courts are contemplating hiring their own security forces.

Karasu

(1,225 posts)
4. This and the fucking 10-year AI regulation ban have no fucking business being in this fucking thing. Invoke the Byrd Act
Tue May 27, 2025, 11:17 PM
Tuesday

NOW.

Kill all unrelated riders/provisions in legislation. This kind of shit is the GOP's ultimate weapon and it needs to fucking die.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's 'Big Beautiful' B...