A double amputee who served in Iraq is pushing lawmakers to end the 'wounded veterans tax'
Source: NBC News
May 26, 2025, 5:37 PM EDT
WASHINGTON When Army veteran Dan Nevins was forced to medically retire from the military after losing both his legs in combat, he thought hed be financially taken care of by the country that he served. But Nevins soon discovered the so-called wounded veterans tax an unofficial term for a federal policy that prohibits certain injured veterans from receiving both their full retirement pay and disability compensation.
I was told I could not receive both, Nevins told NBC News in an interview. And I was like, Wait a minute. Thats not what I thought was going to happen. Its an issue that affects around 50,000 veterans, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, costing them each about $1,900 per month.
Under current federal policy, veterans who have less than 20 years of service and a disability rating under 50% get a dollar taken out of their retirement for every dollar they receive in disability compensation. The disability rating is assigned by the Veterans Affairs Department and assesses how much an injury or disability may impact a veterans health and ability to function.
And now, Nevins is pushing lawmakers in Washington to change that.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/double-amputee-iraq-pushing-lawmakers-end-wounded-veterans-tax-rcna208619

GiqueCee
(2,274 posts)... yet another chapter in the long, sordid history of politicians screwing veterans. They send young men to fight wars too often started for dubious reasons, or outright lies, and then cast them aside and deny them benefits to which they are entitled. What rotten people.
Bengus81
(8,846 posts)plus Corporations so...everything else needs to be CUT to the bone to pay for them. Each day is another group of Republican voters finding that out the hard way.
OMGWTF
(4,728 posts)IcyPeas
(23,613 posts)Pensions for life.
Ray Bruns
(5,232 posts)but Im assuming its less than 20. Hes getting partial retirement pay for so manys active years and a disability pay offset. Apparently, since he didnt have his 20 years in, this is how it works. Not saying if its right or wrong.
BumRushDaShow
(153,292 posts)(and I think most have heard their many commercials)
There was a little more info on him here - https://newsroom.woundedwarriorproject.org/Dan-Nevins
After his initial enlistment and service, he had a break to work as a civilian, but then got called up and that is when he deployed and experienced the injury.
Haven't found anything (yet) to describe how long he served before working in private industry and then how long in private industry (don't know his age).
IbogaProject
(4,453 posts)If one risks life and limb to be in uniformed service than a service related injury should lead to full retirement.