General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is crazy racist:
— (@billkittle.bsky.social) 2026-05-16T00:22:35.673Z
sop
(19,257 posts)applegrove
(133,031 posts)fujiyamasan
(2,008 posts)Or build new ones honoring the traitors.
Yikes. Never thought wed go back to an era before I was even born. Insane.
Whip-poor-will
(498 posts)Pass a Federal laws any confederate statue must include a white flag of surrender.
niyad
(133,984 posts)applegrove
(133,031 posts)Haley lived in Knoxville.
LoisB
(13,431 posts)so. Sorry.
applegrove
(133,031 posts)niyad
(133,984 posts)LoisB
(13,431 posts)"Knox County (TN) is removing Alex Haley's books from its school libraries". Haley lived in Knoxville and is being dishonored in his own hometown.
usonian
(26,569 posts)
Note: Kentucky ain't Tennessee, but I had the graphic already done for another post.
The Jim Crow "works" in this context.
electric_blue68
(27,251 posts)BattleRow
(2,701 posts)usonian
(26,569 posts)In Argentina.
RainCaster
(13,883 posts)None of those deep red racist gerrymandering states will ever get a dollar of my travel budget.
Joinfortmill
(21,653 posts)surfered
(14,218 posts)highplainsdem
(63,048 posts)From WATE Knoxville via Yahoo News:
Removal of Pulitzer Prize winner Roots from Knox County Schools causes backlash
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/removal-pulitzer-prize-winner-roots-231523780.html
Under Tennessees Age-Appropriate Materials Act, parents can file a report if they believe classroom materials are inappropriate. KCS banned Roots because of Chapter 84, which describes the rape of an enslaved woman by a plantation owner.
thucythucy
(9,143 posts)to kids in that community, not the ones old and mature enough to get throigh the first 83 chapters of that book.
Sad, infuriating, disgusting.
Those parents are less about protecting kids than they are about nursing their own hurt fee fees about the history they'd like to erase.
RVN VET71
(3,215 posts)describe a white man raping a black woman. I would hope that some enterprising, pissed off Liberal might consider bringing that up -- in a court of law. If you can ban Haley's book because of a rape scene demonstrating the ugliness of enslavement, than why not a ban on incest (Lot's girls) and masturbation (Onan)? Or the townspeople of Sodom demanding -- apparently -- that the angels visiting Lot be given to them that they might, ahem, "know" them -- or the fact that Lot offered up his daughters to the mob for gang rape?
I can't believe the low browed anti-christ's in Tennessee will get away with their ban on "Roots," without a counter suit to ban the equally filthy bible as well. And don't get me wrong, I appreciate both books, but Haley's speaks directly to the American experience, the Bible speaks to love and hate, cruelty and kindness, reasoned empathy and cold-blooded savagery universally.
BattleRow
(2,701 posts)I don't recall ever any mention of ethnicities..perhaps Ive missed it?
gulliver
(14,071 posts)Just make the book accessible only with parent permission. That should be easy to do with computers. Banning is far too draconian.
jfz9580m
(17,789 posts)There was another book I came across that looked interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchild_in_the_Promised_Land
I have not read much black literature.
I saw another book yesterday that could be interesting but the author has a post on Salon that mentioned Malcolm Gladwell and then when I got what it implied - wrt what I am seeing, I knew that though not directly related it is absolutely outrageous and what I am going to the police about locally.
Unwind Your Mind
(2,363 posts)I read it years ago, I think Ill buy another copy too
NewLarry
(170 posts)And he said, Truly I tell you, no prophet is accepted in his hometown."
GenThePerservering
(3,689 posts)somehow I don't think this will work as intended.
electric_blue68
(27,251 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,245 posts)Whats next? A klan revival.
electric_blue68
(27,251 posts)Dave Bowman
(7,435 posts)eppur_se_muova
(42,467 posts)electric_blue68
(27,251 posts)fujiyamasan
(2,008 posts)https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2007/09/atwaters-strategy/46416/
You start out in 1954 by saying, N****r, n****r, n****r. By 1968 you cant say n****rthat hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states rights, and all that stuff, and youre getting so abstract. Now, youre talking about cutting taxes, and all these things youre talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites. We want to cut this, is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than N****r, n****r.
orangecrush
(31,104 posts)
Melon
(1,662 posts)Banning on sex or violence based on a few paragraphs versus the context of the work is wrong.