General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Slanderous:' White House lashes out at doctor who says they believe Trump 'had a stroke'
trump is not well and is mad that people are noticing. trump will NOT sue because he would have to release his medical records
'Slanderous:' White House lashes out at doctor who says they believe Trump 'had a stroke'
— #TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T20:08:49.000Z
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2674905414/
The simple way to clear all this up is to release all of Trumps medical records including his MRI, Blumenthal told Raw Story.
Amid widespread speculation about Trumps health, the 79-year-old president recently told reporters he had an MRI, then said it was actually a CT scan.
Those remarks sprang back into the public square this week, after Professor Bruce Davidson, of Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, spoke to Blumenthal and the Princeton historian Sean Wilentz, co-hosts of the Court of History podcast.
Davidson said: My impression is President Trump has had a stroke, and I think there's several lines of evidence supporting that. I think his stroke was on the left side of the brain, which controls the right side of the body."
Davidson believes Trump suffered a stroke six months ago or more, earlier in 2025.
struggle4progress
(125,403 posts)paleotn
(21,657 posts)They're batting zero to date.
RockRaven
(18,782 posts)and the leg dragging which are evident in public videos. You know, to prove the slanderer wrong.
If it wasn't a history of stroke(s) as you claim then surely you have knowledge of what it really is. So go ahead and say. We'll wait...
RockCreek
(1,393 posts)And I'm not going to try it, but I bet AI would give it to you with just the basic info.
greatauntoftriplets
(178,659 posts)My sole "law" course was journalism law.
ProfessorGAC
(75,902 posts)...& Employment Law, but I know proving malice, especially by a medical professional, commenting on a public figure is extremely difficult & unlikely.
And, if the do pursue a slander case, discovery would be a nightmare for them
greatauntoftriplets
(178,659 posts)Proving malice is crucial to a verdict.
NotHardly
(2,666 posts)Deuxcents
(25,628 posts)No medical records, no financial tax returns, either. All were privy to is his word about these matters
displacedvermoter
(4,170 posts)and I don't care if there are any lines of evidence supporting this impression. I deeply believe it, have seen it on the Internet, and trust it is true.
Johonny
(25,557 posts)Four or five mini-srokes . . .