General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump says 8 European countries will be charged a 10% tariff for opposing US control of Greenland
NUUK, Greenland (AP) President Donald Trump said Saturday that he would charge a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from eight European nations because of their opposition to American control of Greenland.
Trump said in a social media post that Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland would face the tariff and that it would climb to 25% on June 1 if a deal is not in place for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland by the United States.
The threat of tariffs was a drastic and potentially dangerous escalation of a showdown between Trump and NATO allies, further straining an alliance that dates to 1949 and provides a collective degree of security to Europe and North America. The Republican president has repeatedly tried to use trade penalties to bend allies and rivals alike to his will, generating investment commitments from some nations and pushback from others such as China, Brazil and India.
It was unclear how Trump could impose the tariffs under U.S. law, though he could cite economic emergency powers that are currently subject to a U.S. Supreme Court challenge.
https://apnews.com/article/denmark-greenland-us-trump-4ad99ea3975a8b62d37bd04961feda55
SSJVegeta
(2,408 posts)
assuming they have any.
And if the tariffs arent lifted within a week, remove a small investment each week the tariffs arent lifted -with the amount in removals increasing each week.
Arazi
(8,735 posts)He cant break apart/tariff individually individual countries out of that trading block.
(And ffs, SCOTUS delaying their decision is only encouraging this shit).
Im not a trade expert. Happy to be corrected but my understanding is the EU is one trade entity
Boo1
(161 posts)but I think EU countries could also quite easily move exports around to send items through a different EU county. Of course that wouldn't work for the UK (idiots).
But I actually think this makes it more likely that SCOTUS is going to strike down the tarrifs across the board. I think they were going to anyway, but I think this makes even more likely.
Arazi
(8,735 posts)I admit I havent been tracking every trade deal in 2025 but iirc, the EU just signed their new deal with the US.
Now its blown up.
Any illusion of stability from the US is fucked.
On the positive side, this gives me hope the Generals told him to eat shit. If hes resorting to this kind of escalation in a play to buy Greenland, hes (probably) been told an invasion and military occupation isnt happening
malaise
(293,220 posts)Lock up this stark raving mad lunatic.
Good effin grief- enough!
Time for the Supremes to end this shit
spanone
(141,085 posts)Hope I'm wrong.
malaise
(293,220 posts)Wow! I also hope youre wrong
spanone
(141,085 posts)Most political Supreme Court ever. IMHO.
BeyondGeography
(40,847 posts)That was Sen. Kennedy (Fake Goober - LA), quoted in The Guardian yesterday.
He proves you wrong every day, John.
EdmondDantes_
(1,427 posts)Trump is astoundingly stupid. Like how has he not walked out into traffic level stupid.
greatauntoftriplets
(178,659 posts)sinkingfeeling
(57,326 posts)C_U_L8R
(48,958 posts)What a fucking idiot. Well be lucky to have a single friend after hes done fucking everything up.
dickthegrouch
(4,319 posts)I think the starting negotiating price for Greenland should be $100T (Yes, One hundred trillion USD). At exchange rates prior to the almost inevitable collapse of the dollar.
They want it, let his tech bros fund that!
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(133,192 posts)Donny Shit for Brains,