Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,398 posts)
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 08:19 PM Friday

BREAKING: Judge enters TRO blocking feds from interfering with or arresting peaceful protesters in Minnesota.

BREAKING: Judge enters TRO blocking feds from interfering with or arresting peaceful protesters in Minnesota. Judge Kate Menendez, Biden appointee. Order: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...

Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T01:02:19.997Z
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Judge enters TRO blocking feds from interfering with or arresting peaceful protesters in Minnesota. (Original Post) In It to Win It Friday OP
#4 JustAnotherGen Friday #1
No reasonable canetoad Friday #5
Jabba-the-Trump's goons will just ignore it peppertree 19 hrs ago #42
Shouldn't this be automatic? chicoescuela Friday #2
Not confident this will do anything SSJVegeta Friday #3
If Walz calls out the NG Trump will immediately federalize it, Ocelot II Friday #7
From what I've researched, state police CAN arrest federal officers crimycarny Friday #11
If ICE is executing an immigration arrest, it would be almost impossible Ocelot II Friday #12
It appears no more than 1% of ICE's time is being spent on actually making immigration arrests Wiz Imp Friday #18
Walz did cal out the national guard already, right? SSJVegeta Friday #19
I believe he ordered them to stand ready but didn't acually call them. Amaryllis Friday #21
Got it. Thanks! SSJVegeta Friday #22
Minessota rso Friday #26
So perhaps he can use these rulings to enforce the law with the NG SSJVegeta 21 hrs ago #38
If a Dem wins the WH in 2028, ICE officers could be charged Kaleva Yesterday #30
Good. sheshe2 Friday #4
Link to this excellent and thorough order: Ocelot II Friday #6
Thanks for sharing. yellow dahlia Friday #27
should we start taking bets on whether this order will be ignored? drray23 Friday #8
It may be. But it's a step in the right direction mzmolly Friday #9
+1 progressoid Friday #16
And its a federal judge Boo1 Friday #20
Just maybe this judge will bring in the entire border czar and that team ... turbinetree Friday #10
This is very important. mysteryowl Friday #13
Kicked and recommended Uncle Joe Friday #14
While this is great news angrychair Friday #15
ICE arresting peaceful protester in Minnesota today red dog 1 Friday #17
Meaningless. cab67 Friday #23
Meaningless if nobody will enforce it. Maybe a lawyer can clarify. Bluetus Friday #25
Yes - they should. cab67 20 hrs ago #40
ICE dont give a shit. What the fuck is TRO anyway? BradBo Friday #24
TRO is a Temporary Restricting Order Justice matters. Yesterday #31
Thanks, I probably should have figured that out. BradBo Yesterday #33
'Turning'? OldBaldy1701E 23 hrs ago #34
Restraining Cirsium 18 hrs ago #43
Thanks for the precision. Justice matters. 17 hrs ago #44
Minneapolis judge bars DHS agents from arresting peaceful protesters LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #28
and the consequences when these are all ignored? quakerboy Yesterday #29
It's a start.... democrank Yesterday #32
So, when I am laying on the ground after being attacked by ICE goons... OldBaldy1701E 23 hrs ago #35
I certainly won't be surprised when ICE ignores this Temporary Restraining Order democrank 23 hrs ago #37
The question now is Javaman 23 hrs ago #36
Issuing a TRO is one thing dlk 21 hrs ago #39
Does this judge have the power to order the ICE officer that arrested anybody for peaceful protest into bluestarone 20 hrs ago #41
It should be more than apparent by now popsdenver 15 hrs ago #45
The fact that an order to RESPECT EXISTING LAW is necessary is perhaps the most shameful thing about all this. pat_k 12 hrs ago #46

peppertree

(23,142 posts)
42. Jabba-the-Trump's goons will just ignore it
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 12:17 PM
19 hrs ago

And the Banana Republicans will coddle and cheer them on.

SSJVegeta

(2,408 posts)
3. Not confident this will do anything
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 08:28 PM
Friday

Unless it inspires Minnesota to deploy the national guard and state police to enforce it?

Ocelot II

(129,329 posts)
7. If Walz calls out the NG Trump will immediately federalize it,
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 08:53 PM
Friday

which is probably why it hasn't been done yet. The NG would then be under the control of Trump and under his command, making the current situation even worse. And state police have no authority over ICE immigration-related operations.

crimycarny

(2,023 posts)
11. From what I've researched, state police CAN arrest federal officers
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:20 PM
Friday

According to Google, state police CAN arrest ICE. It's much harder to prosecute, but they can arrest ICE for state violations, including excessive force.

Ocelot II

(129,329 posts)
12. If ICE is executing an immigration arrest, it would be almost impossible
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:24 PM
Friday

for state police to arrest the agent. If the agent was just beating someone up for fun, which they seem to be doing sometimes, that's different, but the defense will always be their exclusive authority over immigration processes. A federal court just issued an injunction against pepper spraying and abusing observers, though.

Wiz Imp

(9,092 posts)
18. It appears no more than 1% of ICE's time is being spent on actually making immigration arrests
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:59 PM
Friday

99% is purposefully trying to antagonize innocent citizens.

rso

(2,639 posts)
26. Minessota
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 11:31 PM
Friday

SCOTUS recently blocked Trump from deploying the NG to States where the Governor is against NG deployment, so I think Walz would have free rein with the NG. Walz can also send State police to augment the Minneapolis City PD.

SSJVegeta

(2,408 posts)
38. So perhaps he can use these rulings to enforce the law with the NG
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 10:35 AM
21 hrs ago

…unless trump invokes the insurrection act -which would seem more like sending active duty military. Regardless it is starting to look like Walz will have no choice but to meet Trumps escalation by ICE and begin arresting agents who break the law.

Kaleva

(40,234 posts)
30. If a Dem wins the WH in 2028, ICE officers could be charged
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 02:27 AM
Yesterday

Could see Noem charged.

The pendulum always swings.

drray23

(8,607 posts)
8. should we start taking bets on whether this order will be ignored?
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:02 PM
Friday

I vote yes. Noem or another one of their goons will declare its infringing on the feds power , blablabla... and ignore it.

mzmolly

(52,672 posts)
9. It may be. But it's a step in the right direction
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:13 PM
Friday

making it harder for Trump and his goons to claim 'immunity' for brutality and a violation of 1A rights.

Boo1

(161 posts)
20. And its a federal judge
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 10:09 PM
Friday

so infringing on federal power is kind of in their job description.

turbinetree

(27,029 posts)
10. Just maybe this judge will bring in the entire border czar and that team ...
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:13 PM
Friday

and ask did you forget about the the first Ten Amendments............bring a lawyer................

mysteryowl

(8,228 posts)
13. This is very important.
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:29 PM
Friday

IF...big IF... they comply it includes ICE vehicle followers.

I scan through the ICE incidents on ICEOUT.ORG.
There are posts from today of vehicle followers being arrested by ICE.

angrychair

(11,764 posts)
15. While this is great news
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:35 PM
Friday

I must reiterate that there is no enforcement mechanism for this TRO if it's violated. It would be up to the DOJ which I can ensure you will completely ignore the court order.

red dog 1

(32,563 posts)
17. ICE arresting peaceful protester in Minnesota today
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 09:53 PM
Friday

You are on the ground, however this seems to have happened today. Are they just dispersed?

Scott Rames (@srames.bsky.social) 2026-01-16T22:27:25.558Z

Bluetus

(2,346 posts)
25. Meaningless if nobody will enforce it. Maybe a lawyer can clarify.
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 11:17 PM
Friday

Last edited Sat Jan 17, 2026, 11:55 AM - Edit history (1)

This is a federal judge. We know DoJ will never enforce that. But can Minneapolis cite police or Minnesota state police enforce a federal injunction?

It seems to me it would have been better for a state judge to issue such an injunction. And it also seems to me that a state court could issue an injunction based on:

* Minn. Stat. § 609.4751 (Impersonating a Peace Officer): A misdemeanor for falsely impersonating an officer to mislead someone;

* Minn. Stat. § 626.863 (Unauthorized Practice): A misdemeanor for non-officers pretending to be one or performing officer duties;

What Constitutes Impersonation?

Verbal Claims: Telling someone you are a police officer.

Fake Gear: Displaying a fake badge, ID, or using police-like lights or equipment on a vehicle.

Performing Duties: Attempting traffic stops or other actions reserved for law enforcement

ICE are not police officers. They have no legal authority to do anything other than enforce JUDICIAL warrants related to immigration. They are impersonating police officers and should be arrested under state law.

cab67

(3,655 posts)
40. Yes - they should.
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 11:33 AM
20 hrs ago

But so far, that hasn't happened. I'm in Evanston half of the time, and I've seen what ICE has been doing. A lot of it would get actual police in trouble. And yet, in spite of the governor and mayor both issuing strong statements against these activities, none of them have been held accountable.

BradBo

(942 posts)
33. Thanks, I probably should have figured that out.
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 07:42 AM
Yesterday

I’m just on edge daily with the way America is turning into early 1930s Germany.

Cirsium

(3,425 posts)
43. Restraining
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 02:01 PM
18 hrs ago

Temporary restraining order.

"A temporary restraining order (TRO) is a short-term pre-trial temporary injunction. To obtain a TRO, a party must convince the judge that they will suffer immediate irreparable injury unless the order is issued. If the judge is convinced that a temporary restraining order is necessary, they may issue the order immediately, without informing the other parties and without holding a hearing. These orders are intended to be stop-gap measures, and only last until the court holds a hearing on whether or not to grant a preliminary injunction. Judges' decisions on whether or not to issue a TRO may not be appealed."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/temporary_restraining_order

Justice matters.

(9,455 posts)
44. Thanks for the precision.
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 02:05 PM
17 hrs ago

And when the TRO is not complied with, because, well, Fascist criminals often don't follow Judges TROs and they know they will probably get away with it.

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,450 posts)
28. Minneapolis judge bars DHS agents from arresting peaceful protesters
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 12:57 AM
Yesterday

The order comes in response to a lawsuit from residents alleging that their rights were violated while they were observing or protesting immigration raids.

Minneapolis judge bars DHS agents from arresting peaceful protesters

www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/...

Brooklynwatch (@brooklynwatch.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T03:07:44.285Z

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/01/16/minneapolis-ice-protester-arrests-judge/

A federal judge on Friday night prohibited Department of Homeland Security agents from arresting people who are peacefully protesting immigration officers in Minneapolis unless they are suspected of criminal activity or obstructing the agents.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez in Minneapolis said her order will remain in effect until the operation concludes or “conditions change such that it is no longer necessary.” It also bars federal agents from retaliating against peaceful protesters, using pepper spray and other nonlethal munitions against demonstrators, and stopping or detaining people in cars for following agents’ vehicles.

A federal judge on Friday night prohibited Department of Homeland Security agents from arresting people who are peacefully protesting immigration officers in Minneapolis unless they are suspected of criminal activity or obstructing the agents.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez in Minneapolis said her order will remain in effect until the operation concludes or “conditions change such that it is no longer necessary.” It also bars federal agents from retaliating against peaceful protesters, using pepper spray and other nonlethal munitions against demonstrators, and stopping or detaining people in cars for following agents’ vehicles....

The lawsuit names Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem, Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd M. Lyons and local ICE field office directors and agents as defendants. The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota is representing the plaintiffs.

quakerboy

(14,737 posts)
29. and the consequences when these are all ignored?
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 01:40 AM
Yesterday

Im gonna assume its likely already been defied, but if not, im sure it will be forthwith

democrank

(12,210 posts)
32. It's a start....
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 06:27 AM
Yesterday

Citizens at least have some protection, something backing them, some legal grounds to stand on.

OldBaldy1701E

(10,309 posts)
35. So, when I am laying on the ground after being attacked by ICE goons...
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 08:47 AM
23 hrs ago

I can feel better about it?

Really?

We already had 'some protections'. They have been and are being ignored.

What makes anyone think this is going to change anything?

Until there is enforcement, this is all political theater. Which is like that line in that Scottish play:

'Tis a tale told by an idiot. Full of sound and fury... signifying nothing.' - Macbeth: Act 5, Scene 5.

democrank

(12,210 posts)
37. I certainly won't be surprised when ICE ignores this Temporary Restraining Order
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 08:57 AM
23 hrs ago

and I don’t think for a moment that everything will be change. I’d rather have a TRO than not because it might help save somebody.

Javaman

(65,205 posts)
36. The question now is
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 08:50 AM
23 hrs ago

Will the Nazis follow the law?

They will probably shrug and say, “try and stop us” then laugh the laugh of arrogance

bluestarone

(21,314 posts)
41. Does this judge have the power to order the ICE officer that arrested anybody for peaceful protest into
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 12:01 PM
20 hrs ago

His court room? I mean the person arrested should have knowledge of exactly WHO arrested them. Edit to have ICE show arrest warrant to judge as well. I mean every arrest papers should be ordered shown to this judge.

popsdenver

(1,678 posts)
45. It should be more than apparent by now
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 04:19 PM
15 hrs ago

that ANY Judges orders against this corruptly installed regime, is merely pissing in the wind.....

pat_k

(12,692 posts)
46. The fact that an order to RESPECT EXISTING LAW is necessary is perhaps the most shameful thing about all this.
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 07:34 PM
12 hrs ago

There is nothing in this order that isn't essentially an order to STOP VIOLATING THE LAW.

Arresting, pepper spraying, shooting rubber bullets at persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, is a violation of their civil rights.

And violations of civil rights "under color of law" are prosecutable crimes.

This feels akin to issuing a TRO against premediated murder or assault and battery. Should be completely unnecessary because there are already laws prohibiting the actions.

And if some higher court overturns this order, what that court will be saying is "We declare that ICE be given free reign to violate civil rights under color of law."

3. Covered Federal Agents are hereby enjoined from:

a. Retaliating against persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge.

b. Arresting or detaining persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge, in retaliation for their protected conduct and absent a showing of probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the person has committed a crime or is obstructing or interfering with the activities of Covered Federal Officers.

c. Using pepper-spray or similar nonlethal munitions and crowd dispersal tools against persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge, in retaliation for their protected conduct.

d. Stopping or detaining drivers and passengers in vehicles where there is no reasonable articulable suspicion that they are forcibly obstructing or interfering with Covered Federal Agents, or otherwise violating 18 U.S.C.§ 111. The act of safely following Covered Federal Agents at an appropriate distance does not, by itself, create reasonable suspicion to justify a vehicle stop.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Judge enters TR...