General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Judge enters TRO blocking feds from interfering with or arresting peaceful protesters in Minnesota.
BREAKING: Judge enters TRO blocking feds from interfering with or arresting peaceful protesters in Minnesota. Judge Kate Menendez, Biden appointee. Order: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T01:02:19.997Z
JustAnotherGen
(37,631 posts)Is huge!
canetoad
(20,293 posts)articulable suspicion. Looks like they're gonna have to learn some law.
peppertree
(23,142 posts)And the Banana Republicans will coddle and cheer them on.
chicoescuela
(2,665 posts)Geebus
SSJVegeta
(2,408 posts)Unless it inspires Minnesota to deploy the national guard and state police to enforce it?
Ocelot II
(129,329 posts)which is probably why it hasn't been done yet. The NG would then be under the control of Trump and under his command, making the current situation even worse. And state police have no authority over ICE immigration-related operations.
crimycarny
(2,023 posts)According to Google, state police CAN arrest ICE. It's much harder to prosecute, but they can arrest ICE for state violations, including excessive force.
Ocelot II
(129,329 posts)for state police to arrest the agent. If the agent was just beating someone up for fun, which they seem to be doing sometimes, that's different, but the defense will always be their exclusive authority over immigration processes. A federal court just issued an injunction against pepper spraying and abusing observers, though.
Wiz Imp
(9,092 posts)99% is purposefully trying to antagonize innocent citizens.
SSJVegeta
(2,408 posts)But nothing past that
Amaryllis
(11,018 posts)SSJVegeta
(2,408 posts)SCOTUS recently blocked Trump from deploying the NG to States where the Governor is against NG deployment, so I think Walz would have free rein with the NG. Walz can also send State police to augment the Minneapolis City PD.
SSJVegeta
(2,408 posts)unless trump invokes the insurrection act -which would seem more like sending active duty military. Regardless it is starting to look like Walz will have no choice but to meet Trumps escalation by ICE and begin arresting agents who break the law.
Kaleva
(40,234 posts)Could see Noem charged.
The pendulum always swings.
sheshe2
(96,159 posts)If they don't then lock THEM up!
Ocelot II
(129,329 posts)yellow dahlia
(4,730 posts)drray23
(8,607 posts)I vote yes. Noem or another one of their goons will declare its infringing on the feds power , blablabla... and ignore it.
mzmolly
(52,672 posts)making it harder for Trump and his goons to claim 'immunity' for brutality and a violation of 1A rights.
Boo1
(161 posts)so infringing on federal power is kind of in their job description.
turbinetree
(27,029 posts)and ask did you forget about the the first Ten Amendments............bring a lawyer................
mysteryowl
(8,228 posts)IF...big IF... they comply it includes ICE vehicle followers.
I scan through the ICE incidents on ICEOUT.ORG.
There are posts from today of vehicle followers being arrested by ICE.
Uncle Joe
(64,321 posts)Thanks for the thread In It to Win It.
angrychair
(11,764 posts)I must reiterate that there is no enforcement mechanism for this TRO if it's violated. It would be up to the DOJ which I can ensure you will completely ignore the court order.
red dog 1
(32,563 posts)You are on the ground, however this seems to have happened today. Are they just dispersed?
— Scott Rames (@srames.bsky.social) 2026-01-16T22:27:25.558Z
cab67
(3,655 posts)ICE will ignore it.
Bluetus
(2,346 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 17, 2026, 11:55 AM - Edit history (1)
This is a federal judge. We know DoJ will never enforce that. But can Minneapolis cite police or Minnesota state police enforce a federal injunction?
It seems to me it would have been better for a state judge to issue such an injunction. And it also seems to me that a state court could issue an injunction based on:
* Minn. Stat. § 609.4751 (Impersonating a Peace Officer): A misdemeanor for falsely impersonating an officer to mislead someone;
* Minn. Stat. § 626.863 (Unauthorized Practice): A misdemeanor for non-officers pretending to be one or performing officer duties;
What Constitutes Impersonation?
Verbal Claims: Telling someone you are a police officer.
Fake Gear: Displaying a fake badge, ID, or using police-like lights or equipment on a vehicle.
Performing Duties: Attempting traffic stops or other actions reserved for law enforcement
ICE are not police officers. They have no legal authority to do anything other than enforce JUDICIAL warrants related to immigration. They are impersonating police officers and should be arrested under state law.
cab67
(3,655 posts)But so far, that hasn't happened. I'm in Evanston half of the time, and I've seen what ICE has been doing. A lot of it would get actual police in trouble. And yet, in spite of the governor and mayor both issuing strong statements against these activities, none of them have been held accountable.
BradBo
(942 posts)Justice matters.
(9,455 posts)Will be appealed (if not already).
BradBo
(942 posts)Im just on edge daily with the way America is turning into early 1930s Germany.
OldBaldy1701E
(10,309 posts)Turned!
Cirsium
(3,425 posts)Temporary restraining order.
"A temporary restraining order (TRO) is a short-term pre-trial temporary injunction. To obtain a TRO, a party must convince the judge that they will suffer immediate irreparable injury unless the order is issued. If the judge is convinced that a temporary restraining order is necessary, they may issue the order immediately, without informing the other parties and without holding a hearing. These orders are intended to be stop-gap measures, and only last until the court holds a hearing on whether or not to grant a preliminary injunction. Judges' decisions on whether or not to issue a TRO may not be appealed."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/temporary_restraining_order
Justice matters.
(9,455 posts)And when the TRO is not complied with, because, well, Fascist criminals often don't follow Judges TROs and they know they will probably get away with it.
LetMyPeopleVote
(175,450 posts)The order comes in response to a lawsuit from residents alleging that their rights were violated while they were observing or protesting immigration raids.
Minneapolis judge bars DHS agents from arresting peaceful protesters
— Brooklynwatch (@brooklynwatch.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T03:07:44.285Z
www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/01/16/minneapolis-ice-protester-arrests-judge/
U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez in Minneapolis said her order will remain in effect until the operation concludes or conditions change such that it is no longer necessary. It also bars federal agents from retaliating against peaceful protesters, using pepper spray and other nonlethal munitions against demonstrators, and stopping or detaining people in cars for following agents vehicles.
A federal judge on Friday night prohibited Department of Homeland Security agents from arresting people who are peacefully protesting immigration officers in Minneapolis unless they are suspected of criminal activity or obstructing the agents.
U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez in Minneapolis said her order will remain in effect until the operation concludes or conditions change such that it is no longer necessary. It also bars federal agents from retaliating against peaceful protesters, using pepper spray and other nonlethal munitions against demonstrators, and stopping or detaining people in cars for following agents vehicles....
The lawsuit names Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem, Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd M. Lyons and local ICE field office directors and agents as defendants. The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota is representing the plaintiffs.
quakerboy
(14,737 posts)Im gonna assume its likely already been defied, but if not, im sure it will be forthwith
democrank
(12,210 posts)Citizens at least have some protection, something backing them, some legal grounds to stand on.
OldBaldy1701E
(10,309 posts)I can feel better about it?
Really?
We already had 'some protections'. They have been and are being ignored.
What makes anyone think this is going to change anything?
Until there is enforcement, this is all political theater. Which is like that line in that Scottish play:
'Tis a tale told by an idiot. Full of sound and fury... signifying nothing.' - Macbeth: Act 5, Scene 5.
democrank
(12,210 posts)and I dont think for a moment that everything will be change. Id rather have a TRO than not because it might help save somebody.
Javaman
(65,205 posts)Will the Nazis follow the law?
They will probably shrug and say, try and stop us then laugh the laugh of arrogance
dlk
(13,130 posts)Who will enforce it?
bluestarone
(21,314 posts)His court room? I mean the person arrested should have knowledge of exactly WHO arrested them. Edit to have ICE show arrest warrant to judge as well. I mean every arrest papers should be ordered shown to this judge.
popsdenver
(1,678 posts)that ANY Judges orders against this corruptly installed regime, is merely pissing in the wind.....
pat_k
(12,692 posts)There is nothing in this order that isn't essentially an order to STOP VIOLATING THE LAW.
Arresting, pepper spraying, shooting rubber bullets at persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, is a violation of their civil rights.
And violations of civil rights "under color of law" are prosecutable crimes.
This feels akin to issuing a TRO against premediated murder or assault and battery. Should be completely unnecessary because there are already laws prohibiting the actions.
And if some higher court overturns this order, what that court will be saying is "We declare that ICE be given free reign to violate civil rights under color of law."
a. Retaliating against persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge.
b. Arresting or detaining persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge, in retaliation for their protected conduct and absent a showing of probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the person has committed a crime or is obstructing or interfering with the activities of Covered Federal Officers.
c. Using pepper-spray or similar nonlethal munitions and crowd dispersal tools against persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge, in retaliation for their protected conduct.
d. Stopping or detaining drivers and passengers in vehicles where there is no reasonable articulable suspicion that they are forcibly obstructing or interfering with Covered Federal Agents, or otherwise violating 18 U.S.C.§ 111. The act of safely following Covered Federal Agents at an appropriate distance does not, by itself, create reasonable suspicion to justify a vehicle stop.