The Trump Doctrine: Violence Is Us
The Trump Doctrine: Violence Is Us
The message is clear—be afraid.
David Corn
Washington, DC, Bureau Chief
(Mother Jones) The military assault on Venezuela, the shooting of a Minneapolis woman by an ICE agent, the launch of the White House’s new revisionist website about January 6—these three events convey a powerful and unsettling message from Donald Trump and his crew: Violence is ours to use, at home and abroad, to get what we want.
In each episode, the Trump administration has employed or embraced violence that seemingly violates the law and extends beyond ordinary state powers. The US military attack on Caracas and kidnapping of its repressive and fraudulently elected president, Nicolás Maduro, violated the Constitution and international law. Absent an imminent threat from Venezuela—and none existed—Trump did not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally launch an act of war against the country. Yet he deployed the tremendous force of the United States’ war machine to dethrone and abduct Maduro, contending that he was some sort of drug lord. But that’s not a legitimate justification for a military attack.
The horrific killing in Minneapolis of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good was unwarranted and arguably criminal. The initial videos make it look like murder. Yet the Department of Homeland Security, before it could investigate, quickly defended and justified the officer’s actions. It claimed that Good was one of a group of “violent rioters” who “weaponized her vehicle” and attempted to “run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them.” The department called this “an act of domestic terrorism” and maintained the ICE officer, “fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots.” In other words, this was right thing to do.
On those videos, though, it did not seem like Good was aiming to mow down ICE officers with her car. She was trying to flee the ICE agents. When the officer shot at her, the car was moving away from him. Initial reporting indicated the officer did not follow ICE protocol. Still, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem praised the officer for acting so fast and stated, “This goes to show the assaults that our ICE officers and law enforcement are under every single day.” That is, well done, sir. .................(more)
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/01/trump-doctrine-violence-ice-minneapolis-venezuela/
= new reply since forum marked as read
- from the administration’s point of view - was the testing of the use of the military against a foreign sovereign. Done without Congressional authorization or apparently even any Congressional knowledge of the plan, and violating international law, the president unilaterally authorized the use of military force in an unprovoked attack to abduct the leader of a foreign nation.
What they have learned from this incident is that there has been no consequential counter to their action. Politicians express outrage, legal authorities point out the blatant illegality, foreign leaders denounce the action, but the administration is suffering no penalty for their outrageous deed. None in the near term, at least. Which shows them that they can “get away” with it… and emboldening them to use military again, possibly in other previously unimagined ways.
And they will. No one is stopping them. Nothing is “off the table.”
