The Andrew formerly known as Prince is a complete sleazebag in the latest Epstein docs

[muriel_volestrangler]

In August 2001, “A” wrote to Maxwell: “I am up here at Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family” before adding:

How’s LA? Have you found me some new inappropriate friends? Let me know when you are coming over as I am free from 25th August until 2nd Sept and want to go somewhere hot and sunny with some fun people before having to put my nose firmly to the grindstone for the Fall.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/dec/23/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-files-andrew-ghislaine-maxwell-us-politics-live-news-updates?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-694a7e358f089326d9f0c2c3#block-694a7e358f089326d9f0c2c3

Freshly released emails from the Epstein files show Ghislaine Maxwell discussing arranging “girls” and “two-legged sight seeing” for a man identified in the correspondence as “The Invisible Man”, who is widely believed to be Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

In a February 2002 email exchange about a proposed trip to Peru, Maxwell forwards messages from Juan Estoban Ganoza outlining possible activities, including visiting the Nazca Lines.

In a February 2002 exchange relayed by Maxwell, Ganoza asks: “About the girls… how old is he?” The Invisible Man later responds in an email to Maxwell: “As for girls well I leave that entirely to you and Juan Estoban!”

A further message sent in March 2002 by Maxwell her contact in Peru expands on the arrangements.

She writes:

Some sight seeing some 2 legged sight seeing (read intelligent pretty fun and from good families) and he will be very happy. I know I can rely on you to show him a wonderful time and that you will only introduce him to friends that you can trust and rely on to be friendly and discreet and fun.

She warns the potential tour guide:

He does not want to read about any trip in the papers whom or what he saw.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/dec/23/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-files-andrew-ghislaine-maxwell-us-politics-live-news-updates?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-694a8ab98f0883df52b577b1#block-694a8ab98f0883df52b577b1

[PJMcK]

1. What a scumbag

Quite disappointing, actually. He fought in the Falklands War and back then I thought he’d be a different and modern royal. Oh, well. If only Trump would suffer a similar ignominy.

[Ritabert]

2. Exposing once again the mistake of a privileged class

Dump the monarchy. An accident of birth and an entitled brat.

[3Hotdogs]

4. Winner of the world class, "Lucky Sperm" Club.

There are lower echelon lucky sperm clubs. A segment of a news radio program I was listening to:

You wouldn't believe this, but here in the U.S., babies are born billionaires and they haven't worked a day in their lives.

[Ritabert]

5. Yes!

[Wednesdays]

11. Hence, my signature line.

"No one worth billions ever earned that wealth themselves. Someone else, either directly or indirectly, earned it for them."

[Javaman]

3. and the brits dropped the investigation

I think old Charlie told them to back off.

the royals like their cushy life and I honestly believe that there is a real fear that it would finally end the gigantic money suck that the monarchy is.

[hoosierspud]

9. A while ago, Vanity Fair reported

That the royal family begged the Bush administration to sweep the Epstein stuff under the rug, due to Andrew's involvement. That was why Acosta gave Epstein a slap on the wrist and allowed him to continue his "business".

[Javaman]

12. I wonder if Charlie is in the files as well.

[Luz]

17. I think charlies interests lie more in the matronly

mistress area

[Johonny]

6. Can Charles execute him in the tower of London?

[Attilatheblond]

7. Can he? Maybe. Would he? Unlikely.

But I feel when Charles is gone, William would have no problem locking him away in the tower, where accidents do happen.

[Wednesdays]

13. Or, simply vanish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_in_the_Tower

The Princes in the Tower refers to the mystery of the fate of the deposed King Edward V of England and his younger brother Prince Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York, heirs to the throne of King Edward IV of England. The brothers were the only sons of the king by his queen, Elizabeth Woodville, living at the time of their father's death in 1483. Aged 12 and 9 years old, respectively, they were lodged in the Tower of London by their paternal uncle and England's regent, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, in preparation for Edward V's forthcoming coronation. Before the young king's coronation, however, he and his brother were declared illegitimate by Parliament. Gloucester ascended the throne as Richard III.

It is unclear what happened to the two princes after the last recorded sighting of them in the tower.

[Doc_Technical]

8. He will always be known as "Randy Andy".

[muriel_volestrangler]

10. Yeah, he picked that up before he got married

and most people assumed his girlfriends, roughly his age, were all willing and open-eyed about any relationship or just sex, so it wasn't anything to worry about.

It's this "I need people to procure a waiting string of females under half my age, in advance of me visiting a country, to keep me happy" stuff that's rather far beyond "randy".

[John1956PA]

14. Recommended, especially for the "formerly . . . Prince" reference.

[BigDemVoter]

15. He is an entitled and disgusting piece of sh*t.

What an appalling person in every regard.

[BlueWaveNeverEnd]

16. Ugh