Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFull transcript on Ronald Reagan Free and Fair Trade Speech:
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/radio-address-nation-free-and-fair-trade-4Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade
April 25, 1987
My fellow Americans:
Prime Minister Nakasone of Japan will be visiting me here at the White House next week. It's an important visit, because while I expect to take up our relations with our good friend Japan, which overall remain excellent, recent disagreements between our two countries on the issue of trade will also be high on our agenda.
As perhaps you've heard, last week I placed new duties on some Japanese products in response to Japan's inability to enforce their trade agreement with us on electronic devices called semiconductors. Now, imposing such tariffs or trade barriers and restrictions of any kind are steps that I am loath to take. And in a moment I'll mention the sound economic reasons for this: that over the long run such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer. But the Japanese semiconductors were a special case. We had clear evidence that Japanese companies were engaging in unfair trade practices that violated an agreement between Japan and the United States. We expect our trading partners to live up to their agreements. As I've often said: Our commitment to free trade is also a commitment to fair trade.
But you know, in imposing these tariffs we were just trying to deal with a particular problem, not begin a trade war. So, next week I'll be giving Prime Minister Nakasone this same message: We want to continue to work cooperatively on trade problems and want very much to lift these trade restrictions as soon as evidence permits. We want to do this, because we feel both Japan and the United States have an obligation to promote the prosperity and economic development that only free trade can bring.
Now, that message of free trade is one I conveyed to Canada's leaders a few weeks ago, and it was warmly received there. Indeed, throughout the world there's a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition. Now, there are sound historical reasons for this. For those of us who lived through the Great Depression, the memory of the suffering it caused is deep and searing. And today many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period called the Smoot-Hawley tariff greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery.
Applegrove:
Thanks to my cousin for the suggestion
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Full transcript on Ronald Reagan Free and Fair Trade Speech: (Original Post)
applegrove
Friday
OP
MarineCombatEngineer
(16,330 posts)1. Dammit!!!
As much as I loathed the man, he was on point here.
Champp
(2,409 posts)2. Why do Republicans hate Ronald Reagan?
ThoughtCriminal
(14,676 posts)3. Apparently the Reagan Library objects to the Canadian ad
Because it only uses an expert which omits the part about him imposing new duties on Japanese goods. I think the "Reagan Library" is just afraid of Trump and his minions.
But the quote is accurate, the context does not change and the historical reference certainly applies. Especially the reference to the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs.
Trump is claiming that it's "Fake", which is all his followers need to hear - but that is a complete lie.
applegrove
(128,942 posts)4. Reagan Organization is run by someone who worked
in the first Trump WH, and then Fox.