Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(11,782 posts)
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 12:13 PM Friday

JUST IN: Judge Emil Bove's dissent to 3rd Cir denying en banc in case striking PA mail-in ballot dating rule.

Josh Gerstein
‪@joshgerstein.bsky.social‬

JUST IN: Judge Emil Bove's dissent to 3rd Cir denying en banc in case striking PA mail-in ballot dating rule. Bove mocks impact: 'For a voter with a functioning pen, sufficient ink & average hand dexterity, this should take less than five seconds.' Doc: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26196180-paballotdatingbovedissent102425/

JUST IN: Judge Emil Bove's dissent to 3rd Cir denying en banc in case striking PA mail-in ballot dating rule. Bove mocks impact: 'For a voter with a functioning pen, sufficient ink & average hand dexterity, this should take less than five seconds.' Doc: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...

Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein.bsky.social) 2025-10-24T15:51:24.755Z

This is the abhorrently unethical man who served Trump and got rewarded with an appeals court seat. Democrats should begin impeachment proceedings against him the moment they are able to do so.

Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-10-24T16:05:44.116Z
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
JUST IN: Judge Emil Bove's dissent to 3rd Cir denying en banc in case striking PA mail-in ballot dating rule. (Original Post) In It to Win It Friday OP
Is this his first opinion? He's already earning his pay. NT mahatmakanejeeves Friday #1
For those of us that are legalese challenged, MarineCombatEngineer Friday #2
So apparently there was a law that required nail-in voters to add the date to the outer envelope unblock Friday #4
Thanks for that explanation. MarineCombatEngineer Friday #5
Asshole crud Friday #3

unblock

(55,730 posts)
4. So apparently there was a law that required nail-in voters to add the date to the outer envelope
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 01:34 PM
Friday

And of course republicans seized on this to disqualify undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes even if they were legal otherwise.

Apparently they didn't even notify voters or give them an opportunity to fix it.

The 3rd circuit majority upheld the decision that this requirement was unconstitutional, Bove dissented, wanting to keep any stupid excuse to disqualify votes.

MarineCombatEngineer

(16,330 posts)
5. Thanks for that explanation.
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 01:37 PM
Friday

Figures that a Been A Dick Donald would want to disenfranchise voters who aren't supporters of the criminal in the WH.

crud

(1,111 posts)
3. Asshole
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 01:14 PM
Friday

wants to bring back Jim Crow. Echos of Bush V Gore giving states the power to take away the right to vote in federal elections or even have a federal election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»JUST IN: Judge Emil Bove'...