General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrijalva Sues Congress as Johnson Delays Her House Swearing-In
Grijalva Sues Congress as Johnson Delays Her House Swearing-In
https://news.bgov.com/bloomberg-government-news/grijalva-sues-congress-as-johnson-delays-her-house-swearing-in
Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva and the state of Arizona filed a lawsuit against the House Tuesday, as Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to allow her to be sworn in almost a month after she was elected to represent the states seventh district.
The suit was filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
Grijalva won a special election to replace her late father on Sept. 23, but wont become a member of Congress until Johnson officially seats her. Grijalva will narrow the GOPs House advantage to 219-214. Shell also be the deciding 218th signature, forcing a vote to release files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which Republican leadership and President Donald Trump oppose.
As Johnson keeps the House out of Washington amid a 21-day and counting government shutdown, he has refused to swear Grijalva in until the chamber returns to session. Grijalva and other Democrats say this denies Southern Arizonans the full congressional representation theyre entitled to.
MagickMuffin
(17,965 posts)He certainly didnt have a problem swearing in his party members.
Deuxcents
(24,459 posts)GoCubsGo
(34,485 posts)Cha
(315,216 posts)no_hypocrisy
(53,540 posts)I've used that cause of action once where an embezzler "misappropriated" $19,000+ from my client (an organization) and claimed it belonged to him. We were going to the court to do a King Solomon, i.e., to whom did the money legally belong. (We got it without going to court as the embezzler folded.)
As for Grijalva, I would have gone with Writ of Mandamus, the basis of the famous SC case Marbury v Madison.
I'm sure they'll get the same result.