Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The conservative case against Trump's worst judicial nominee - Ian Millhiser @ Vox
Vox (Archived)Emil Bove is one of President Donald Trump’s former criminal defense lawyers. He’s now a senior Justice Department official — and he’s widely described as Trump’s “enforcer” for his hard-charging, unapologetically MAGA approach to that job.
If Trump gets his way, moreover, Bove could soon become one of the most powerful people in the United States. Last week, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to approve Bove’s nomination to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, after the committee’s Democrats walked out in protest. In the likely event that Bove is confirmed, he’ll be well-positioned to become one of the United States’ nine philosopher kings and queens.
According to legal journalist Jeffrey Toobin, “the president is grooming Mr. Bove for bigger things — possibly a seat on the Supreme Court.” Should that happen, it would mark a return to cronyism in Supreme Court nominations. For many decades, presidents of both parties have chosen justices largely based on those justices’ allegiance to their political party’s ideological agenda, rather than based on personal loyalty to the president.
Indeed, Trump’s decision to place personal loyalty over conservative ideology may explain why much of the opposition to Bove is bipartisan. Bove isn’t simply opposed by lefty groups that traditionally protest many Republican judicial nominees — he is also opposed by some prominent right-wing judicial activists, one of whom warned that Trump is turning “his back on principled legal conservatives.”
Bove’s views on a wide range of issues that have historically animated movement conservatives — such as abortion and religion — are largely unknown. So, while Bove will almost certainly be unflinchingly loyal to Trump if he is confirmed to the federal bench, there’s no way to know whether he will hold to the Republican line on a wide range of domestic policy issues.
If Trump gets his way, moreover, Bove could soon become one of the most powerful people in the United States. Last week, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to approve Bove’s nomination to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, after the committee’s Democrats walked out in protest. In the likely event that Bove is confirmed, he’ll be well-positioned to become one of the United States’ nine philosopher kings and queens.
According to legal journalist Jeffrey Toobin, “the president is grooming Mr. Bove for bigger things — possibly a seat on the Supreme Court.” Should that happen, it would mark a return to cronyism in Supreme Court nominations. For many decades, presidents of both parties have chosen justices largely based on those justices’ allegiance to their political party’s ideological agenda, rather than based on personal loyalty to the president.
Indeed, Trump’s decision to place personal loyalty over conservative ideology may explain why much of the opposition to Bove is bipartisan. Bove isn’t simply opposed by lefty groups that traditionally protest many Republican judicial nominees — he is also opposed by some prominent right-wing judicial activists, one of whom warned that Trump is turning “his back on principled legal conservatives.”
Bove’s views on a wide range of issues that have historically animated movement conservatives — such as abortion and religion — are largely unknown. So, while Bove will almost certainly be unflinchingly loyal to Trump if he is confirmed to the federal bench, there’s no way to know whether he will hold to the Republican line on a wide range of domestic policy issues.
The conservative case against Trump’s worst judicial nominee www.vox.com/scotus/42060...
— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser.bsky.social) 2025-07-22T14:18:38.381Z