Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe MAHA Report Has Been Updated With Fresh Errors
https://www.notus.org/health-science/maha-report-update-citation-errorsNo paywall link
https://archive.li/sqT8z
The Trump administrations clean up of the Make America Healthy Again Commissions hallmark and error-riddled report is opening new questions about how the reports authors drew some of its sweeping conclusions about the state of Americans health.
At least 18 of the original reports citations have been edited or completely swapped out for new references since NOTUS first revealed the errors Thursday morning. While some of the original reports inconsistencies have been changed, a few of the new updated citations continue to misinterpret scientific studies.
One study NOTUS identified as misinterpreted in the original report was intended to support the claim that psychotherapy is more effective for children than medication for treating mental health concerns. That study was swapped out with a new systematic overview authored by psychologist Pim Cuijpers, who told NOTUS via email that MAHAs new citation is also wrong.
Cuijpers said his referenced study doesnt cover psychiatric medications in children at all the research was focused on adults. The citation is located in a section of the MAHA report titled, American children are highly medicated and its not working.
Treatments of depression in adolescents have a different efficacy than treatments in adults, so they cannot be compared, and this reference is therefore not usable in adolescents, said Cuijpers, one of Amsterdams most-cited psychologists. It also fails to state that the combination of therapy and antidepressants is superior to therapy or antidepressants alone.
He added that there is no evidence that psychotherapy is more effective than antidepressants in adolescents.
*snip*
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The MAHA Report Has Been Updated With Fresh Errors (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Friday
OP
Maddow Blog-As more fake citations emerge in the 'MAHA' report, White House struggles with a defense
LetMyPeopleVote
Friday
#9
C_U_L8R
(47,397 posts)1. Their corruption is only exceeded by their stupidity
And laziness.
yardwork
(66,824 posts)4. They can't even be bothered to lie effectively.

BOSSHOG
(42,594 posts)2. Karoline Leavitt will explain it all away
ProfessorGAC
(72,924 posts)8. Just More Formatting Errors
Formatting! She actually said that!
BoRaGard
(5,655 posts)3. How perfectly republicon
American taxpayers will be billed in triplicate for this typical republicon malfeasance/incompetence.
tanyev
(46,579 posts)5. Meet the new AI slop, same as the old AI slop.
SheltieLover
(68,852 posts)6. Exactly!

highplainsdem
(56,326 posts)7. +1,000,000
LetMyPeopleVote
(164,078 posts)9. Maddow Blog-As more fake citations emerge in the 'MAHA' report, White House struggles with a defense
To describe references to nonexistent scientific research as some formatting issues is like saying the Titanic confronted some evening issues.
As more fake citations emerge in the âMAHAâ report, White House struggles with a defense
— Democracy Skies in Blueness - Resist (@democracyblue.bsky.social) 2025-05-30T13:28:42.960Z
To describe references to nonexistent scientific research as âsome formatting issuesâ is like saying the Titanic confronted âsome evening issues.â www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/fake-citations-emerge-maha-report-white-house-struggles-defense-rcna209915
Almost immediately after Donald Trump and his White House team unveiled The MAHA Report: Making Our Children Healthy Again last week, problems emerged. The Washington Post reported, for example, that some of the reports suggestions stretched the limits of science, and offered misleading representations of scientific research.
A week later, a devastating report published by NOTUS advanced the underlying story considerably, highlighting the unambiguous fact that the MAHA document misinterprets some studies and cites others that dont exist, according to the listed authors. Soon after, The New York Times identified additional faulty references in the report. From the Times article:
While theres been no official explanation for how, exactly, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his team managed to release a much-hyped official document with fake citations, multiple reports noted the likely culprit. As The Washington Post reported, Some of the citations ... appear to have been generated using artificial intelligence, resulting in numerous garbled scientific references and invented studies, AI experts said Thursday.
.....For example, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was pressed for some kind of explanation for the MAHA debacle. The presidents chief spokesperson responded by claiming there were some formatting issues with the document.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:iu4j537hox5huj4bwnwgub4z/post/3lqdc55klup2i
.....Leavitt nevertheless added that the White House has complete confidence in Kennedy. She didnt elaborate as to why, exactly, Kennedy remains in the presidents good graces, though it appears to have something to do with Trumps indifference to whether the conspiracy theorist leading the Department of Health and Human Services gets things right or wrong.
A week later, a devastating report published by NOTUS advanced the underlying story considerably, highlighting the unambiguous fact that the MAHA document misinterprets some studies and cites others that dont exist, according to the listed authors. Soon after, The New York Times identified additional faulty references in the report. From the Times article:
The Trump administration released a report last week that it billed as a clear, evidence-based foundation for action on a range of childrens health issues. But the report, from the presidential Make America Healthy Again Commission, cited studies that did not exist. These included fictitious studies on direct-to-consumer drug advertising, mental illness and medications prescribed for children with asthma.
While theres been no official explanation for how, exactly, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his team managed to release a much-hyped official document with fake citations, multiple reports noted the likely culprit. As The Washington Post reported, Some of the citations ... appear to have been generated using artificial intelligence, resulting in numerous garbled scientific references and invented studies, AI experts said Thursday.
.....For example, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was pressed for some kind of explanation for the MAHA debacle. The presidents chief spokesperson responded by claiming there were some formatting issues with the document.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:iu4j537hox5huj4bwnwgub4z/post/3lqdc55klup2i
Link to tweet
.....Leavitt nevertheless added that the White House has complete confidence in Kennedy. She didnt elaborate as to why, exactly, Kennedy remains in the presidents good graces, though it appears to have something to do with Trumps indifference to whether the conspiracy theorist leading the Department of Health and Human Services gets things right or wrong.