Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,992 posts)
Wed May 28, 2025, 07:25 PM May 28

US court blocks Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs

trump had no inherent power to declare a tariff. The emergency statute cited does not discuss tariffs. These tariffs were never authorized by any statutory authority.

US court blocks Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs reut.rs/4jtA5N0

Reuters (@reuters.com) 2025-05-28T23:15:08.754Z

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/us-court-blocks-trump-s-liberation-day-tariffs/ar-AA1FFqD8?ocid=BingNewsSerp#comments

NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. federal court on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs from going into effect, ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from nations that sell more to the United States than they buy.

The Manhattan-based Court of International Trade said the U.S. Constitution gives the U.S. Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other countries that are not trumped by the president's emergency powers to safeguard the U.S. economy.

The lawsuit, filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties, was the first major legal challenge to Trump's tariffs.

The companies - which range from a New York wine and spirits importer to a Virginia-based maker of educational kits and musical instruments - have said the tariffs will hurt their ability to do business.

The lawsuit is one of seven court challenges to Trump's tariff policies, along with challenges from 13 U.S. states and other groups of small businesses.

I am predicting that a couple more courts will also be ruling soon against trump's tariffs
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,992 posts)
1. US court blocks Trump from imposing some tariffs
Wed May 28, 2025, 07:29 PM
May 28

This will be fun to watch

Breaking - US court blocks Trump from imposing some tariffs

www.cnn.com/2025/05/28/b...

Jamie Gangel (@jamiegangel.bsky.social) 2025-05-28T23:20:49.015Z

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/28/business/us-court-blocks-trumps-tariffs

A three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade, a relatively low-profile court in Manhattan, ruled Wednesday to temporarily halt Trump’s global tariffs that he imposed citing emergency economic powers, including his “Liberation Day” tariffs imposed on April 2.

The court ruled in favor of a permanent injunction, grinding Trump’s global tariffs to a halt before “deals” with most other trading partners have even been reached. That means the bulk – but not all – of Trump’s tariffs are put in a standstill.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

newdeal2

(3,468 posts)
3. We should send our bills to the White House
Wed May 28, 2025, 07:33 PM
May 28

A smart political operative would find a way to have a little fun and engage the public on this. Tariffs are broadly unpopular.

Johonny

(24,271 posts)
13. I was wondering, there was 22 billion collect last month
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:47 PM
May 28

A lot, not all of that was obtained illegally. How do companies get their money back?

I sense more lawsuits . . .

Johonny

(24,271 posts)
14. Yeah
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:47 PM
May 28

A lot, not all of that was obtained illegally. How do companies get their money back?

I sense more lawsuits . . .

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,992 posts)
5. Federal court says Trump doesn't have the power to impose tariffs unilaterally
Wed May 28, 2025, 07:39 PM
May 28

This will be fun to watch. trump has no statutory authority to impose tariffs

Federal court says Trump doesn’t have the power to impose tariffs unilaterally

A federal court has determined that President Donald Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs, dealing a sweeping blow to the president's main weapon in his ongoing global trade war. A panel of…

(@surajworld.bsky.social) 2025-05-28T23:27:07Z

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/federal-court-trump-power-impose-tariffs-unilaterally/story


A federal court has determined that President Donald Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs, dealing a sweeping blow to the president's main weapon in his ongoing global trade war.

A panel of judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade found the tariffs were unlawful and permanently vacated them.

Since Trump announced sweeping tariffs on more than 50 countries in April, his administration has faced half a dozen lawsuits challenging the president's ability to impose tariffs without the approval of Congress.

The Court of International Trade issued its ruling in a case brought by a group of five small businesses who argued that Trump's tariffs are an "unprecedented power grab."

Lawyers for the small businesses alleged that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act -- which Trump invoked to impose the tariffs -- does not give the president the right to issue "across-the-board worldwide tariffs," and that Trump's justification for the tariffs was invalid.

BeerBarrelPolka

(1,840 posts)
6. This might actually help the fool
Wed May 28, 2025, 07:41 PM
May 28

His dumbass tariffs are ridiculous. Getting rid of them (if this will do it) will help the situation. Trump will spin it.

DET

(2,128 posts)
11. OMG
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:41 PM
May 28

That is hilarious.

‘Hide ketchup somewhere he won't look, like salad bar.’

‘Cover any priceless works of art.’

‘Distract with…Ivanka nudes.’

moondust

(20,961 posts)
9. Good start.
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:26 PM
May 28

We'll see what SCROTUS does.

No single person should have that much power to play stupid games with the global economy.

DET

(2,128 posts)
10. Unanimous Ruling
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:36 PM
May 28

Two of the three judges were appointed by Republican Presidents (including Trump) and one by Obama.

tritsofme

(19,428 posts)
12. Interesting that the panel included Trump, Reagan, and Obama nominees. Suggests Trump might be cooked at SCOTUS too.
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:42 PM
May 28

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,992 posts)
16. In order to get a stay of the ruling on tariffs, trump's attorneys had to promise to refund all tariffs Reply to BumRus
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:26 AM
May 30

trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump's tariffs. The court of appeals issued the stay of the two injunctions based on the agreement by the trump administration to refund all tariffs if the ruling of these two courts are upheld on appeal. 






BREAKING - Trump admin pledges to refund tariffs: Donald Trump’s Justice Department persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals to stay the lower court’s injunction on his emergency tariffs—after pledging to refund anyone who paid them if it ultimately loses. In its filings, the government stated, “If tariffs imposed on plaintiffs during these appeals are ultimately held unlawful, then the government will issue refunds to plaintiffs, including any post-judgment interest that accrues.” The court granted the stay.


LetMyPeopleVote

(166,992 posts)
17. The attorneys for the plaintiffs challenging trump's tariffs do not believe that refunds are sufficient
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 07:15 PM
Jun 2

The offer by the trump attorneys to give refunds is not sufficient to compensate the persons having to pay these tariffs. The people being forced to pay the tariffs are not fully compensated for their damages by mere refunds





The plaintiffs need to be fully compensated for any damages suffered due to the trump tariffs
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US court blocks Trump's '...