General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJake Tapper's book has climbed to the #3 spot on Amazon's best seller list
Sales arent collapsing.

creon
(1,576 posts)Too many people take people like Tapper seriously,
bucolic_frolic
(50,554 posts)Maybe there's a silver lining. We've having a conversation about how old is too old that can reverberate on the current occupant.
Buy this crap they produce in mass.
yardwork
(66,786 posts)They spike sales numbers, store the books in warehouses, and then release them to the deep discount resellers.
All of Trumps' spawn and cronies have sold ghost-written books that "topped the charts" for a few weeks. Means nothing.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)yardwork
(66,786 posts)No one is reading this book. It is one of those here is your free gift. It's like an Anne Koulter book. Despite all those sales, I've never heard one passage quoted. It's like no one ever read page one of her crap.
Intractable
(1,042 posts)A person or company with a vested interest in pumping up Take Japper or the message that Biden was impaired can just buy up the available copies, and give them out for free at some Republican function.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)Mountainguy
(1,948 posts)The week.
obamanut2012
(28,480 posts)themaguffin
(4,488 posts)boonecreek
(976 posts)The N.Y. Times best sellers list.
https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/hardcover-nonfiction/
I almost posted the fiction list which is probably where it belongs.
senseandsensibility
(22,217 posts)Amazon best seller list is one thing, but if this book were really selling it would at least be on the NYT best seller list.
Self Esteem
(2,184 posts)Self Esteem
(2,184 posts)boonecreek
(976 posts)Thanks for the info.
Renew Deal
(83,957 posts)Celerity
(50,032 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)Polybius
(20,011 posts)Guess the poster was wrong. Here's the link:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220342877
sl8
(16,509 posts)I thought the same thing when I first saw the headline, "Jake Tapper's Biden Book Is Collapsing", but the article doesn't say anything about its sales, only that the book is losing credibility.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)It doesnt say anything about sales. Maybe next read more than the headline so you dont make a false assumption.
Polybius
(20,011 posts)That's worse.
fujiyamasan
(195 posts)The right has their own news aggregators too and the headlines are also the same clickbait (just targeting a different audience).
These sites take other peoples reporting and apply their own spin. Politico has its own problems, but like other publications, it would lose all credibility and access if it were found to be making things up.
I just wish people would realize sites like politicsUSA and rawstory do not really practice any real journalism. And Id rather not run every news story through an ideological filter which basically reinforces my own biases, but maybe thats just me.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)Just another incorrect assumption.
fujiyamasan
(195 posts)That it will take time to get a better perspective of the Biden presidency and short lived reelection campaign, but I still find the word collapsing to be clickbait. I dont think post election books are definitive in any sense. They are a first draft and being so rushed, I wouldnt be surprised if several of the claims are exaggerated, as may be the case with the case with the ads being unusable. It sounds like it was a more nuanced situation as the politico article states.
Ill wait and hear what the Democratic Party response is (especially Bidens cabinet members). If the claims in the book are disproven it will destroy Tappers reputation, and Ill be just as happy as anyone here to see it happen.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)It still said nothing about sales. And several, such as Jamie Harrison, have already come forward to say events in the book didnt happen.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)Not making a statement. The clue is the ? at the end.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)that it was or feedback that it wasnt and they may have heard wrong or misinterpreted what they had read. Otherwise, why ask such a question?
SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)for asking a question. All I know is that they were asking a question, not making a statement.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)All I know is that it was a question, not a statement.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)I didnt but you inferred from my comment that I was.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)But you did say sales arent collapsing. I merely asked who said that they were because I had never seen anyone say that either on DU or elsewhere.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)I was curious if someone had claimed that they were.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)Last edited Wed May 28, 2025, 08:29 AM - Edit history (1)
As you have seen, I provided an answer. The same information that I laterI posted in the OP.
From my statement of fact, you tried to read my mind thinking that I implied that other DUers were saying that sales were collapsing. Otherwise you would have phrased your post to say I havent seen posts by others saying that sales were collapsing..
I could see you asking who they were IF I had stated in the OP that members were saying the book sales were collapsing.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,620 posts)That's your projection. You made a statement and simply asked a question about it.
Sympthsical
(10,621 posts)No one needs to read the book. People have eyes and ears and, you know, actually lived through the last few years.
No money to Jake Tapper required.
The weird attempts at "You're not seeing what you're clearly seeing" is somewhat concerning, but I think that's just where we are now with politics on social media. Construct narrative that may or may not have a relationship with reality, push narrative, crush anything that works against narrative.
At that point, isn't it just religion?
Keepthesoulalive
(1,341 posts)Reporting on the imbecile in the White House. I dont care about gossip,I care about my country.
He is manipulating the stock market, grifting, lying and has the worst group of buffoons over all of our agencies. Jake Tapper is a well paid shill, he is not a journalist. Lets stop giving him air.
AStern
(289 posts)nt
themaguffin
(4,488 posts)ornotna
(11,287 posts)Oof indeed.
themaguffin
(4,488 posts)fujiyamasan
(195 posts)Not sure I would consider that collapsing either, but maybe it already peaked last week with all the hype.
A week doesnt make a trend , so well see if it goes much farther. I think these sort of books come out, get a lot of buzz at first and fade within a week or two. Biden was also in the news with the cancer diagnosis. Theres only so much news an ex-president makes, and its impossible to ignore the current guys daily antics.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)Wiz Imp
(5,177 posts)meaning that #2 ranking encompasses ALL sales to date. It will drop fast enough.
https://www.amazon.com/charts/2025-05-18/mostsold/nonfiction?ref=chrt_bk_nav_fwd
Also, #1 has been on the list for 25 weeks, so I doubt it is racking up huge weekly sales after 25 weeks.
General Guidelines:
To hit #1 on the overall Amazon bestseller list: 3,500 to 5,000 sales in 24 hours are estimated.
To hit the New York Times bestseller list: It takes about 5 times more sales than hitting #1 on Amazon.
So being high on Amazon's list doesn't imply huge sales.
Initech
(104,975 posts)
vapor2
(2,418 posts)no_hypocrisy
(51,680 posts)Write scathing reviews on his Amazon page.
stillcool
(33,940 posts)but not really, or I'd go look. Guess I don't want to give the bullshit even that amount of interest. Yet I clicked on this thread. What a putz I can be.
Tree Lady
(12,405 posts)I wouldn't trust most of them as they will be by people pretending to be democrats as one review said a book all dems need to read!
Self Esteem
(2,184 posts)...for covering up Biden's decline.
Not a lot of reviews from people calling the book bullshit - just that Tapper was part of the cover up and it was apparent to anyone paying attention Biden was declining mentally (not that I agree but that's the tone of most negative reviews).
Blue Owl
(56,327 posts)
Bettie
(18,319 posts)a lot based on who is involved in the biggest fuckery on any given day.

ananda
(31,862 posts)...
Takket
(22,980 posts)Rethugs hate Biden, can't imagine why they would want to read a book about him.
Indies hardly pay attention to politics, can't imagine why they would read a book about Biden.
Democrats: Self explanatory.
Who is reading this??????
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,026 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(163,722 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(163,722 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(163,722 posts)Last edited Tue May 27, 2025, 08:03 PM - Edit history (1)
This book is full of bald face lies
Link to tweet
Kingofalldems
(39,595 posts)W_HAMILTON
(9,027 posts)Last edited Tue May 27, 2025, 07:43 PM - Edit history (1)
Heckuva job, Tappy!
PS - And, no, this isn't sarcasm -- his """hot new release""" is literally lagging behind a decades-old Dr. Seuss book.
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,026 posts)

betsuni
(27,942 posts)They'll smile politely and look away, muttering "Asshole" into their drink.
Chasstev365
(5,502 posts)Trump?
Fox?
CNN?
The Heritage Foundation?
Judicial Watch?
LetMyPeopleVote
(163,722 posts)Biden world has been fact checking Tapper's silly book. Tapper is a bad reporter who made up crap for this book
Link to tweet
This time, its about a closed-door town hall in April 2024. Tapper and Thompson claim Biden had trouble answering pre-approved questions and that the footage was so bad, the campaign scrapped it.
Exceptthats not what happened.
Biden allies just dropped three never-before-seen ads from the event. Yes, they were polished. Yes, they tested them. But the idea they were unusable? Thats Tapper spinunverifiable, uncorroborated, and now contradicted by the actual footage.
The kicker? Tapper defends his version with a quote from an unnamed Biden adviser he personally supplied to Playbook. Even Playbook couldnt verify who said it. Thats the level of fact-checking behind this book.
This isnt journalism. Its a smear job dressed up as reporting, built on anonymous sources, cherry-picked anecdotes, and claims the actual people involved say are false.
Bidens team isnt just disputing Tappers narrativetheyre dismantling it, piece by piece.
And Tappers credibility? Its unraveling just as fast.
crimycarny
(1,819 posts)I know that Jake Tapper was supposed to appear on Jimmy Kimmel as a guest, but then Kimmel cancelled that show and aired a repeat instead.
I haven't seen Jake as a guest on the main late-night shows, only fringe shows such as Megyn Kelly's podcast, Piers Morgan. Has anyone else? Perhaps I just missed it.
Wiz Imp
(5,177 posts)As a comparison, Bob Woodward's "Rage" about Trump from 2020 sold 600,000 copies in its first week alone. His book "Fear" from 2018 sold 750,000 in its first day.
Not very impressive numbers from Tapper...
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,026 posts)You seem determined to be a cheerleader for someone blatantly lying and profiting from the filthy lies about President Biden.
Or just a "I'm right, you're wrong," thread.
Kaleva
(39,411 posts)If it bothers you that the book is selling well at this time
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,026 posts)

Kingofalldems
(39,595 posts)Republicans good. Democrats bad.
betsuni
(27,942 posts)sakabatou
(44,782 posts)Kaleva
(39,411 posts)thought crime
(226 posts)Won't matter for long. Cover up? Just remind them that Reagan was clearly afflicted while in office.
Patton French
(1,686 posts)NT
Mike Nelson
(10,588 posts)... attention, Jake Trapper googles, popularity, sales are not "collapsing" and the book is a success. BUT, I can save people the money they might spend on the book - here is what happened:
President Biden considered his advancing years and decided to drop out of the 2024 race. Naturally, he decided to pass the baton to his very capable VP Kamala Harris. Regrettably, they lost the election - and a demented man, with serious cognition issues, won.
betsuni
(27,942 posts)352 pages to tell us Joe Biden is old and bore people to death with his phony scandal which doesn't even seem to be about anything.
Response to Kaleva (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
catrose
(5,274 posts)pstokely
(10,791 posts)like an old encyclopedia set?