Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Supreme Court Just Handed A Match To An Arsonist
TPM
The Biggest News Of The Week
In a tumultuous week that marked four months since Donald Trumps second inauguration, nothing will have as long-lasting and damaging an effect on American democracy as the Supreme Courts decision yesterday to upend 90 years of its own precedent and strip independent agencies of their independence.
The high courts six-justice conservative majority fundamentally altered the structural balance of power among the branches of the federal government. It handed vast new power to the White House to put politics above expertise, partisanship above reason, and power over principle.
All of that would have been bad enough at any other time, but the Roberts Court just handed a match to a confirmed arsonist in Donald Trump. As bad as the first four months of his second term have been, it was not enough to dislodge the conservative justices from their ideological attachment to the radical theory of a unitary executive.
The immediate result of their decision will be to enable and encourage Trumps rampage across federal government to bring it to heel to his whims in dramatic and disturbing ways. But it also tilts the playing field of American politics in profound but often imperceptible ways that will persist for decades.
One wonders how independent agencies will even function. They were created and have existed over the course of nearly a century under a certain set of assumptions about the importance of experts, consistency in policy-making, and insulation from partisan politics. What is their use or reason for being now if theyre merely appendages of the White House doing its bidding?
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Supreme Court Just Handed A Match To An Arsonist (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Sunday
OP
JoseBalow
(7,591 posts)1. Is the picture necessary?

Response to JoseBalow (Reply #1)
littlemissmartypants This message was self-deleted by its author.
mopinko
(72,599 posts)4. nah. it's fair use.
DFW
(58,137 posts)2. When (if!) the next Democratic president takes office, how quick will the Cheneytrump six be
..in scrambling to undo what they have done during the Trumptatorship?
kentuck
(113,885 posts)5. The FED is an independent agency?
But I think their most immediate target are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.