General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEeeewwwww! I found a Hegseth in my Journal
I was looking back through my DU Journal posts and found this from 2019:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211862136
Whatever you think of AOC, reallocating her office's staff budget so that the lowest-rung people are able to have an income they can live on without being trust-fund babies is not "socialism and communism on display."
But the pResident's most trusted advisors call it that anyway.
Link to tweet
Aaron Rupar
✔
@atrupar
.@PeteHegseth on @AOC paying her staffers a living wage: "Its actually socialism and communism on display.
(Poor Pete clearly has no idea what those terms mean.)

Walleye
(40,565 posts)Theres no part of the United States government that resembles socialism. The fox guy just said it, the important people should get more money. Everybodys important dammit
JHB
(37,692 posts)There are three kinds of people who call the New Deal "socialism:
1) Conservatives/RWers, who call everything they don't like "socialism";
2) Super-lefties who want to claim credit for it even though their political counterparts back in the 30s and 40s railed against it as "selling out" and "inadequate" (because those people were actual socialists, wanted actual socialism, and the New Deal sucked away any momentum toward their goal); and
3) People who've picked up the meaning from either of the above two groups.
It's also why "democratic socialist" is such a damaging, counterproductive term. This country does not exactly do "nuance" and "subtle" regarding that word. Use it in any sense and people's minds go right to that big country that had the word right in its name, and you put yourself in a hole when trying to persuade them.
Walleye
(40,565 posts)They keep bringing up the Green new deal. I dont know who made that up.
JHB
(37,692 posts)An early use of the phrase "Green New Deal" was by journalist Thomas Friedman.[16] He argued in favor of the idea in The New York Times and The New York Times Magazine.[17][18] In January 2007, Friedman wrote:
If you have put a windmill in your yard or some solar panels on your roof, bless your heart. But we will only green the world when we change the very nature of the electricity grid moving it away from dirty coal or oil to clean coal and renewables. And that is a huge industrial project much bigger than anyone has told you. Finally, like the New Deal, if we undertake the green version, it has the potential to create a whole new clean power industry to spur our economy into the 21st century.[18]
Friedman expanded upon the idea in his September 2008 book Hot, Flat, and Crowded.[19] This approach was taken up in Britain by the Green New Deal Group,[20] which published its eponymous report on July 21, 2008.[21] The concept was further popularized and put on a wider footing when the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) began to promote it internationally.
Walleye
(40,565 posts)They settled on woke. Simple and easy to spell I guess.
JHB
(37,692 posts)Not that they'll give up "woke" any more than they've given up "political correctness". They'll simply adjust the frequency it pops up on the playlist.